Cited by 150Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

GAD, Metacognition, and Mindfulness: An Information Processing Analysis

Wells, A.·2002·Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Abstract

In this commentary I discuss the integration of mindful procedures in cognitive therapy of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and attempt to answer questions concerning the effects of mindfulness on information processing and on mechanisms purported to maintain GAD in the metacognitive model of this disorder. Different techniques that promote mindfulness can be identified, including mindfulness meditation and attention training. These techniques are intended to disrupt repetitive styles of dysfunctional thinking. I argue that the effect of mindfulness strategies on information processing in emotional disorder can be conceptualized in metacognitive terms as (a) activating a metacognitive mode of processing; (b) disconnecting the influence of maladaptive beliefs on processing; (c) strengthening flexible responding to threat; and (d) strengthening metacognitive plans for controlling cognition. Although mindfulness meditation may have general treatment applications, the metacognitive model of GAD suggests caution in using this treatment in GAD. It is unclear which dimension of worry should be targeted, and mindfulness meditation does not contain information that can lead to unambiguous disconfirmation of erroneous beliefs about worry. © 2002 American Psychological Association D12.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clipsy/9.1.95

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

  • Worry and the incubation of intrusive images following stress

    Wells, A., & Papageorgiou, C. (1995) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)00087-z · Cited by 229 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “7. Worrying after exposure to stress is associated with an incubation of intrusive images (Butler, Wells, & Dewick; 1995; Wells & Papageorgiou, 1995 ), and individual differences in the use of worry to control thoughts is associated with the development of post-traumatic stress disorder after trauma (Holeva, Tarrier,…”
    Self-citation

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wells, A.
Venue
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Published
2002-02-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
95-100
ISSN
  • 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2850
OpenAlex
W2113910579
Cited by
150
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, mindfulness, metacognition, cognitive therapy, mindfulness meditation, attention training, information processing, maladaptive beliefs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review