Cited by 11Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research Topics

The explanatory role of facets of dispositional mindfulness and negative beliefs about worry in anxiety symptoms

Open access
Sherwood, Ashra, Carydias, Ellen, Whelan, Cheyenne, Emerson, Dr Lisa-Marie·2020·Personality and Individual Differences

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2020.109933

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wells' theory suggested that when applied correctly and in line with the metacognitive model, mindfulness may be useful in altering patients' negative beliefs about worry.

    “The findings align with Wells’ theory which suggested that when applied correctly and in line with the metacognitive model, mindfulness may be useful in altering patients’ negative beliefs about worry [77].”

    From Association between time perspective and metacognition among Lebanese adults: the mediating role of mindfulness (2023) · cites this paper as [77]

    The Introduction and §4.1 (Theoretical Implications; page unavailable) attribute to Wells the view that mindfulness can facilitate metacognitive regulation and reduce the influence of unhelpful cognitions. The paper also suggests mindfulness-related nonreactivity may mitigate negative beliefs about worry, but it does not say that correctly applied mindfulness alters those beliefs in patients. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherwood, A., Carydias, E., Whelan, C., & Emerson, D. L.-M.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
160
Pages
109933
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011853914
Cited by
11
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
trait mindfulness, mindfulness facets, anxiety symptoms, non-judgment, non-reactivity, mediation, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review