Cited by 248Complex Network Analysis TechniquesOpinion Dynamics and Social InfluenceComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis

Information cascades in complex networks

Jalili, Mahdi, Perc, Matjaž·2017·Journal of Complex Networks

Abstract

Information cascades are important dynamical processes in complex networks. An information cascade can describe the spreading dynamics of rumour, disease, memes, or marketing campaigns, which initially start from a node or a set of nodes in the network. If conditions are right, information cascades rapidly encompass large parts of the network, thus leading to epidemics or epidemic spreading. Certain network topologies are particularly conducive to epidemics, while others decelerate and even prohibit rapid information spreading. Here we review models that describe information cascades in complex networks, with an emphasis on the role and consequences of node centrality. In particular, we present simulation results on sample networks that reveal just how relevant the centrality of initiator nodes is on the latter development of an information cascade, and we define the spreading influence of a node as the fraction of nodes that is activated as a result of the initial activation of that node. A systemic review of existing results shows that some centrality measures, such as the degree and betweenness, are positively correlated with the spreading influence, while other centrality measures, such as eccentricity and the information index, have negative correlation. A positive correlation implies that choosing a node with the highest centrality value will activate the largest number of nodes, while a negative correlation implies that the node with the lowest centrality value will have the same effect. We discuss possible applications of these results, and we emphasize how information cascades can help us identify nodes with the highest spreading capability in complex networks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/comnet/cnx019

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Classical epidemic models such as the susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) model have been used to study the diffusion of information, such as rumors or news.

    “Classical epidemic models such as the susceptible–infected–recovered (SIR) model (44) have been used to study the diffusion of information, such as rumors or news (45–47).”

    From The echo chamber effect on social media (2021) · cites this paper as [45]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jalili, M., & Perc, M.
Affiliations
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • University of Maribor (SI)
Corresponding author
Jalili, Mahdi
Venue
Journal of Complex Networks
Published
2017-07-06
ISSN
  • 2051-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-1329
OpenAlex
W2752687826
Cited by
248
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
18.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Complex Networks (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Keywords
information cascades, complex networks, epidemic spread, rumor propagation, node centrality, betweenness centrality, degree centrality, eccentricity, information index, network topology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review