The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Non-invasive assessment of the age related changes in stiffness of major branches of the human arteries
Abstract
The static mechanical properties of major branches of the human arteries (common carotid artery, abdominal aorta, femoral artery, and brachial artery) were studied in 39 subjects, aged 6-81 years, using an ultrasonic phase locked echo tracking system that allows continuous transcutaneous measurement of the diameter of the artery. The stiffness indices were calculated from the relation between systemic blood pressure and arterial diameter. With advancing age there was a significant increase in the diameter of all arteries with a reduction in percentage change in diameter. The stiffness index increased with age in all arteries; however, in the brachial and femoral arteries there was considerable variation in the individual values for a given age. The age associated increase in stiffness was statistically significant only in the common carotid artery and the abdominal aorta. Although the mechanical properties of the peripheral arteries were significantly influenced by the measuring environment, the calculated stiffness indices were less vulnerable to these stimuli in the central arteries. These results indicate that the stiffness indices of the peripheral muscular arteries are modified appreciably by vasoactive stimuli and that the mechanical properties of the deeper elastic arteries provide sufficiently reliable information about changes caused by aging and arteriosclerosis. The new ultrasonic method used appears to be suitable for this analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Is Pulse Pressure Useful in Predicting Risk for Coronary Heart Disease?: The Framingham Heart Study
Franklin, S. S., Khan, S. A., Wong, N. D., Larson, M. G., & Levy, D. (1999) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.100.4.354 · Cited by 1,759
Shirai, K., Hiruta, N., Song, M., Kurosu, T., Suzuki, J., Tomaru, T., Miyashita, Y., Saiki, A., Takahashi, M., Suzuki, K., et al. (2011) · Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis · doi:10.5551/jat.7716 · Cited by 458
Metabolic syndrome amplifies the age-associated increases in vascular thickness and stiffness
Scuteri, A., Najjar, S. S., Muller, D. C., Andres, R., Hougaku, H., Metter, E. J., & Lakatta, E. G. (2004) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.061 · Cited by 447
Chen, C.-H., Ting, C.-T., Nussbacher, A., Nevo, E., Kass, D. A., Pak, P., Wang, S.-P., Chang, M.-S., & Yin, F. C. P. (1996) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.27.2.168 · Cited by 401
van der Heijden-Spek, J. J., Staessen, J. A., Fagard, R. H., Hoeks, A. P., Boudier, H. A. S., & Van Bortel, L. M. (2000) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.35.2.637 · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- KAWASAKI, T., SASAYAMA, S., YAGI, S.-I., ASAKAWA, T., & HIRAI, T.
- Venue
- Cardiovascular Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987-09-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 678-687
- ISSN
- 0008-6363 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014231512
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non-invasive assessment of the age related changes in stiffness of major branches of the human arteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cvr/21.9.678
- The paper
- KAWASAKI, T., SASAYAMA, S., YAGI, S.-I., ASAKAWA, T., & HIRAI, T. (1987). Non-invasive assessment of the age related changes in stiffness of major branches of the human arteries. Cardiovascular Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/21.9.678
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.