Cited by 39Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Neuronal nitric oxide synthase regulates regional brain perfusion in healthy humans

Open access
O’Gallagher, Kevin, Puledda, Francesca, O’Daly, Owen, Ryan, Matthew, Dancy, Luke, Chowienczyk, Philip J, Zelaya, Fernando, Goadsby, Peter J +1 more·2022·Cardiovascular Research

Abstract

Aims: Neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) is highly expressed within the cardiovascular and nervous systems. Studies in genetically modified mice suggest roles in brain blood flow regulation while dysfunctional nNOS signalling is implicated in cerebrovascular ischaemia and migraine. Previous human studies have investigated the effects of non-selective NOS inhibition but there has been no direct investigation of the role of nNOS in human cerebrovascular regulation. We hypothesized that inhibition of the tonic effects of nNOS would result in global or localized changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF), as well as changes in functional brain connectivity. Methods and results: We investigated the acute effects of a selective nNOS inhibitor, S-methyl-L-thiocitrulline (SMTC), on CBF and brain functional connectivity in healthy human volunteers (n = 19). We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study with either intravenous SMTC or placebo, using magnetic resonance imaging protocols with arterial spin labelling and functional resting state neuroimaging. SMTC infusion induced an ∼4% decrease in resting global CBF [−2.3 (−0.3, −4.2) mL/100g/min, mean (95% confidence interval, CI), P = 0.02]. In a whole-brain voxel-wise factorial-design comparison of CBF maps, we identified a localized decrease in regional blood flow in the right hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus following SMTC vs. placebo (2921 voxels; T = 7.0; x = 36; y = −32; z = −12; P < 0.001). This was accompanied by a decrease in functional connectivity to the left superior parietal lobule vs. placebo (484 voxels; T = 5.02; x = −14; y = −56; z = 74; P = 0.009). These analyses adjusted for the modest changes in mean arterial blood pressure induced by SMTC as compared to placebo [+8.7 mmHg (+1.8, +15.6), mean (95% CI), P = 0.009]. Conclusions: These data suggest a fundamental physiological role of nNOS in regulating regional CBF and functional connectivity in the human hippocampus. Our findings have relevance to the role of nNOS in the regulation of cerebral perfusion in health and disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cvr/cvab155

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]Mai J, Paxinos G, Voss T. Atlas of the Human Brain. 3rd ed. London, UK: Elsevier; 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Gallagher, K., Puledda, F., O’Daly, O., Ryan, M., Dancy, L., Chowienczyk, P. J., Zelaya, F., Goadsby, P. J., & Shah, A. M.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Department of Neuroimaging, Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK
  • Department of Clinical Pharmacology, King’s College London British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, School of Cardiovascular Medicine & Sciences, London, UK
Corresponding author
  • Goadsby, Peter J
  • Shah, Ajay M
Venue
Cardiovascular Research
Published
2021-04-30
Volume
118
Issue
5
Pages
1321-1329
ISSN
  • 0008-6363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-3245
OpenAlex
W3171548369
Cited by
39
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cardiovascular Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
  • Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London (IS-BRC-1215-20006)
  • NIHR SLaM Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London (IS-BRC-1215-20018)
  • King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. We also acknowledge support from the British Heart Foundation (CH/1999001/11735, RE/18/2/34213)
  • UK Medical Research Council Clinical Research Training Fellowship (MR/R017751/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
neuronal nitric oxide synthase, cerebral blood flow, S-methyl-L-thiocitrulline, nNOS inhibition, brain functional connectivity, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, superior parietal lobule, cerebrovascular regulation, arterial spin labeling, resting-state functional connectivity
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Enzyme Inhibitors, Humans, Nitric Oxide, Perfusion, Regional Blood Flow, Cross-Over Studies, Mice, Nitric Oxide Synthase Type I

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review