Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 326

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Simulation of multiple ion channel block provides improved early prediction of compounds’ clinical torsadogenic risk

Open access
Mirams, Gary R., Cui, Yi, Sher, Anna, Fink, Martin, Cooper, Jonathan, Heath, Bronagh M., McMahon, Nick C., Gavaghan, David J., Noble, Denis·2011·Cardiovascular Research

Abstract

AIMS: The level of inhibition of the human Ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG) channel is one of the earliest preclinical markers used to predict the risk of a compound causing Torsade-de-Pointes (TdP) arrhythmias. While avoiding the use of drugs with maximum therapeutic concentrations within 30-fold of their hERG inhibitory concentration 50% (IC(50)) values has been suggested, there are drugs that are exceptions to this rule: hERG inhibitors that do not cause TdP, and drugs that can cause TdP but are not strong hERG inhibitors. In this study, we investigate whether a simulated evaluation of multi-channel effects could be used to improve this early prediction of TdP risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: We collected multiple ion channel data (hERG, Na, L-type Ca) on 31 drugs associated with varied risks of TdP. To integrate the information on multi-channel block, we have performed simulations with a variety of mathematical models of cardiac cells (for rabbit, dog, and human ventricular myocyte models). Drug action is modelled using IC(50) values, and therapeutic drug concentrations to calculate the proportion of blocked channels and the channel conductances are modified accordingly. Various pacing protocols are simulated, and classification analysis is performed to evaluate the predictive power of the models for TdP risk. We find that simulation of action potential duration prolongation, at therapeutic concentrations, provides improved prediction of the TdP risk associated with a compound, above that provided by existing markers. CONCLUSION: The suggested calculations improve the reliability of early cardiac safety assessments, beyond those based solely on a hERG block effect.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cvr/cvr044

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 326

Metadata

Authors
Mirams, G. R., Cui, Y., Sher, A., Fink, M., Cooper, J., Heath, B. M., McMahon, N. C., Gavaghan, D. J., & Noble, D.
Venue
Cardiovascular Research
Published
2011-02-07
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
53-61
ISSN
  • 0008-6363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-3245
OpenAlex
W2137618884
Cited by
326
References
31
FWCI
15.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulation of multiple ion channel block provides improved early prediction of compounds’ clinical torsadogenic risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cvr/cvr044
The paper
Mirams, G. R., Cui, Y., Sher, A., Fink, M., Cooper, J., Heath, B. M., McMahon, N. C., Gavaghan, D. J., & Noble, D. (2011). Simulation of multiple ion channel block provides improved early prediction of compounds’ clinical torsadogenic risk. Cardiovascular Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvr044

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.