Cited by 27Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksSemantic Web and Ontologies

The Disease Portals, disease-gene annotation and the RGD disease ontology at the Rat Genome Database

Open access
Hayman, G. Thomas, Laulederkind, Stanley J. F., Smith, Jennifer R., Wang, Shur-Jen, Petri, Victoria, Nigam, Rajni, Tutaj, Marek, De Pons, Jeff +2 more·2016·Database

Abstract

The Rat Genome Database (RGD;http://rgd.mcw.edu/) provides critical datasets and software tools to a diverse community of rat and non-rat researchers worldwide. To meet the needs of the many users whose research is disease oriented, RGD has created a series of Disease Portals and has prioritized its curation efforts on the datasets important to understanding the mechanisms of various diseases. Gene-disease relationships for three species, rat, human and mouse, are annotated to capture biomarkers, genetic associations, molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets. To generate gene-disease annotations more effectively and in greater detail, RGD initially adopted the MEDIC disease vocabulary from the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database and adapted it for use by expanding this framework with the addition of over 1000 terms to create the RGD Disease Ontology (RDO). The RDO provides the foundation for, at present, 10 comprehensive disease area-related dataset and analysis platforms at RGD, the Disease Portals. Two major disease areas are the focus of data acquisition and curation efforts each year, leading to the release of the related Disease Portals. Collaborative efforts to realize a more robust disease ontology are underway. Database URL:http://rgd.mcw.edu.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/database/baw034

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Disease Ontology data were further extended and newer ontologies such as Rat Disease Ontology and Mammalian Phenotype Ontology were added to facilitate comparison of target-disease and target-phenotype associations across multiple species.

    “The Disease Ontology (DO) (8) data were further extended and newer ontologies such as Rat Disease Ontology (9) and Mammalian Phenotype Ontology (10) were added to facilitate comparison of target-disease and target-phenotype associations across multiple species.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayman, G. T., Laulederkind, S. J. F., Smith, J. R., Wang, S.-J., Petri, V., Nigam, R., Tutaj, M., De Pons, J., Dwinell, M. R., & Shimoyama, M.
Affiliations
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Corresponding author
Hayman, G. Thomas
Venue
Database
Published
2016
Volume
2016
Pages
baw034
ISSN
1758-0463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2310108216
Cited by
27
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Database (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-64541, HL064541, HL-094271, R01HL094271, R01HL064541)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
Keywords
Rat Genome Database, disease ontology, rat genetics, biomarkers, genetic association, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease, Humans, Software, Species Specificity, Genome, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Databases, Genetic, Mice, Rats, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Gene Ontology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review