Cited by 37Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Exploring human disease using the Rat Genome Database

Open access
Shimoyama, Mary, Laulederkind, Stanley J. F., De Pons, Jeff, Nigam, Rajni, Smith, Jennifer R., Tutaj, Marek, Petri, Victoria, Hayman, G. Thomas +4 more·2016·Disease Models & Mechanisms

Abstract

Rattus norvegicus, the laboratory rat, has been a crucial model for studies of the environmental and genetic factors associated with human diseases for over 150 years. It is the primary model organism for toxicology and pharmacology studies, and has features that make it the model of choice in many complex-disease studies. Since 1999, the Rat Genome Database (RGD; http://rgd.mcw.edu) has been the premier resource for genomic, genetic, phenotype and strain data for the laboratory rat. The primary role of RGD is to curate rat data and validate orthologous relationships with human and mouse genes, and make these data available for incorporation into other major databases such as NCBI, Ensembl and UniProt. RGD also provides official nomenclature for rat genes, quantitative trait loci, strains and genetic markers, as well as unique identifiers. The RGD team adds enormous value to these basic data elements through functional and disease annotations, the analysis and visual presentation of pathways, and the integration of phenotype measurement data for strains used as disease models. Because much of the rat research community focuses on understanding human diseases, RGD provides a number of datasets and software tools that allow users to easily explore and make disease-related connections among these datasets. RGD also provides comprehensive human and mouse data for comparative purposes, illustrating the value of the rat in translational research. This article introduces RGD and its suite of tools and datasets to researchers – within and beyond the rat community – who are particularly interested in leveraging rat-based insights to understand human diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dmm.026021

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rat has potential for geroscience research because its aging physiology is closer to humans than mice, especially for onset of certain age-related conditions, and its larger size permits serial sampling and imaging not feasible in mice.

    “However, the rat has tremendous potential for use in geroscience research, owning to its aging physiology being closer to humans compared to mice, especially with respect to onset of certain age-related conditions, as well as its larger size, which permits serial sampling and imaging studies not feasible in the mouse [36–41].”

    From Reducing Senescent Cell Burden in Aging and Disease (2020) · cites this paper as [41]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shimoyama, M., Laulederkind, S. J. F., De Pons, J., Nigam, R., Smith, J. R., Tutaj, M., Petri, V., Hayman, G. T., Wang, S.-J., Ghiasvand, O., Thota, J., & Dwinell, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Surgery, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
Corresponding author
Shimoyama, Mary
Venue
Disease Models & Mechanisms
Published
2016-10-01
Volume
9
Issue
10
Pages
1089-1095
ISSN
  • 1754-8403 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-8411
OpenAlex
W2529573769
Cited by
37
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Disease Models & Mechanisms (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL064541)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
Rat Genome Database, laboratory rats, Rattus norvegicus, disease models, gene nomenclature, rat strains, quantitative trait loci, genetic markers, disease annotation, pathway analysis, phenotype data, comparative genomics, human disease
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease, Humans, Genome, Databases, Genetic, Rats, Data Mining, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Gene Ontology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review