Cited by 68Fatty Acid Research and HealthAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Omega-3 fatty acids supplementation and risk of atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Open access
Lombardi, Marco, Carbone, Salvatore, Del Buono, Marco Giuseppe, Chiabrando, Juan Guido, Vescovo, Giovanni Maria, Camilli, Massimiliano, Montone, Rocco Antonio, Vergallo, Rocco +4 more·2021·European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained cardiac arrhythmia worldwide1 and it is associated with high morbidity and mortality, ultimately making it a major public health burden. Omega-3 fatty acids (O3FA) supplementation are being utilized in clinical practice to reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in patients with elevated plasma triglycerides. Safety has been, however, questioned as several cardiovascular (CV) outcomes trials of O3FA supplementation showed a potential increase of AF, when compared with placebo.2 In this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we investigated whether O3FA supplementation is associated with an increased risk for AF compared to placebo. We conducted a systematic search of RCTs of O3FA supplementation on CV outcomes, which also included data on the incidence of AF up to November 2020. The main endpoint of the study was the onset of AF. For inferential purposes, a frequentist pairwise meta-analysis was conducted by using Poisson regression model with random study effects. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were chosen over relative risk as outcome measure because of the different follow-up of the selected studies. The pairwise meta-analysis was performed with the R statistical software (4.0.0 version) using R package ‘meta’. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed with Cochran’s Q method and I2 testing. A threshold of P < 0.10 was used to define the presence of heterogeneity for the Q test. I2 was considered substantial when it was >50%. The presence of publication bias for small study effect appraisal was assessed by visual examination of funnel plots and was quantified by Egger’s test and Begg’s test. Detailed characteristics of the five included studies are presented in Supplementary material online, Table S1.3–7 In the random effect model, O3FA supplementation was associated with an increased risk of incident AF as compared with placebo [IRR 1.37, 95% CI (1.22–1.54), P < 0.001] (Figure 1). There were no significant statistical heterogeneity between studies and no publication bias, even if the funnel plot suggested some asymmetry. As a sensitivity analysis, we included the VITAL rhythm trial. Results confirmed a higher risk of AF in the group receiving O3FA supplementation as compared with placebo [IRR 1.29, 95% CI (1.13–1.48), P = 0.0002] (Supplementary material online, Figure S1). Forest plot for atrial fibrillation events. IRR, incidence rate ratio. Forest plot for atrial fibrillation events. IRR, incidence rate ratio. The results of this meta-analysis show that individuals at high risk for, or with established CVD and elevated plasma triglycerides treated with O3FA supplementation have a significantly higher incidence of AF events, compared to placebo. We also found no heterogeneity and no small study publication bias. O3FA supplementation has been utilized to reduce CVD and CVD-related mortality in patients at high CV risk and elevated plasma triglycerides. The CV benefits, however, have been inconsistent; specifically, in the REDUCE-IT trial, a high dose of O3FA supplementation with highly purified icosapent ethyl was associated with a significantly lower risk for the primary composite CV endpoint3. Contrarily, the recent STRENGTH trial, which utilized the same dose of O3FA supplementation, but containing a formulation of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), was neutral on the composite primary endpoint.6 Moreover, lower doses of O3FA supplementation have not improved CV outcomes.2 Although the positive effects of O3FA supplementation on the composite CV endpoints have been inconsistent, most trials have been associated with an increased risk for AF occurrence. Patients receiving icosapent ethyl in the REDUCE-IT3 trial presented a significantly greater risk for incidence AF or atrial flutter, which was further confirmed in STRENGTH. Even lower doses of O3FA supplementation has shown a potential signal for increased risk for AF,2,4,5 proposing that regardless of the dose of O3FA supplementation implemented in the trials and potential-related benefits on CV outcomes, O3FA supplementation may increase the risk for AF. The results of our meta-analysis confirmed this finding, which is concerning given the large proportion of patients eligible for treatment with O3FA supplementation. The conflicting results of the beneficial effects of O3FA supplementation on CV outcomes along with their potential risk for harm, highlight the need for future studies to ultimately confirm the potential beneficial effects of this class of drugs. Moreover, the mechanisms through which O3FA supplementation may increase the risk for AF remain largely unknown, clearly highlighting the need for more mechanistic clinical trials to investigate such effects. In fact, O3FA have been previously shown to stabilize the cardiac membrane resulting in protective effects against arrhythmias, including ventricular arrhythmias

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In this updated meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials, omega-3 fatty acid supplementation was associated with a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation compared with placebo (IRR 1.37, 95% CI 1.22–1.54). A sensitivity analysis including the VITAL rhythm trial confirmed the association (IRR 1.29, 95% CI 1.13–1.48).

Key findings

  • In the random-effects model, O3FA supplementation was associated with an increased risk of incident AF versus placebo: IRR 1.37, 95% CI 1.22–1.54, P < 0.001.
  • In a sensitivity analysis including the VITAL rhythm trial, the higher AF risk persisted: IRR 1.29, 95% CI 1.13–1.48, P = 0.0002.
  • There was no significant statistical heterogeneity between studies and no publication bias, although the funnel plot suggested some asymmetry.
  • Five RCTs were included; the population was individuals at high risk for, or with established, cardiovascular disease and elevated plasma triglycerides.

Methods

  • Systematic search of RCTs of O3FA supplementation on cardiovascular outcomes that also included data on AF incidence, up to November 2020; five studies were included.
  • Main endpoint was onset of AF; a frequentist pairwise meta-analysis used a Poisson regression model with random study effects, reporting incidence rate ratio (IRR) and 95% CI because of differing follow-up across studies.
  • Analysis was performed in R 4.0.0 using the “meta” package; heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran’s Q and I², and publication bias with funnel plots plus Egger’s and Begg’s tests.

Limitations

  • Stated: lack of systematic haemorrhagic risk assessment, lack of a systematic search for AF events in the individual studies, and some studies did not include AF as a prespecified outcome, potentially under-reporting AF events.
  • Stated: it was a study-level meta-analysis, so individual participant aspects were not accounted for; placebo arms were often different among trials; and the sensitivity analysis used only VITAL rhythm results presented at the American Heart Association 2020 because full data had not been disclosed.
  • Evident from the text: this is a brief letter reporting five included studies, so detailed protocol and risk-of-bias assessment are not reported.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvab008

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

4 of 14 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § 8 Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli, Italy

    The STRENGTH trial confirmed a greater risk for incident atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter with icosapent ethyl.

    “Patients receiving icosapent ethyl in the REDUCE-IT3 trial presented a significantly greater risk for incidence AF or atrial flutter, which was further confirmed in STRENGTH.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Nicholls, 2020, Effect of high-dose omega-3 fatty acids vs corn oil on major adverse cardiovascular events in patients at high cardiovascular risk: the STRENGTH randomized clinical trial, JAMA source

      The Clinical End Points section (p. 6) reports more new-onset atrial fibrillation in STRENGTH patients receiving omega-3 CA than corn oil (2.2% vs 1.3%). The discussion (p. 12) distinguishes that treatment from icosapent ethyl in REDUCE-IT. STRENGTH therefore supports a similar atrial-fibrillation finding, but it did not test icosapent ethyl or establish an increased risk of atrial flutter. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationreasoning
    § 8 Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli, Italy

    Regardless of the dose of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation implemented in the trials and potential-related benefits on cardiovascular outcomes, omega-3 fatty acid supplementation may increase the risk for atrial fibrillation.

    “proposing that regardless of the dose of O3FA supplementation implemented in the trials and potential-related benefits on CV outcomes, O3FA supplementation may increase the risk for AF.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [2] Lombardi, 2020, Impact of different doses of omega-3 fatty acids on cardiovascular outcomes: a pairwise and network meta-analysis, Curr Atheroscler Rep source
    • cites [4] Kromhout, 2010, N-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction, N Engl J Med source

      Our copy discusses ventricular arrhythmias and cardiovascular outcomes (Abstract, End Points, and Subgroup Analyses), but the retrieved passages do not address atrial fibrillation risk. Searches for atrial fibrillation and adverse events found no passage supporting a dose-independent increase in that risk. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [5] Roncaglioni, 2013, N-3 fatty acids in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors, N Engl J Med source
  • Premisecitation
    § 8 Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli, Italy

    Even lower doses of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation have shown a potential signal for increased risk for atrial fibrillation.

    “Even lower doses of O3FA supplementation has shown a potential signal for increased risk for AF,2,4,5”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [2] Lombardi, 2020, Impact of different doses of omega-3 fatty acids on cardiovascular outcomes: a pairwise and network meta-analysis, Curr Atheroscler Rep source
    • cites [4] Kromhout, 2010, N-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction, N Engl J Med source

      The Abstract describes a low-dose omega-3 trial, but it does not report atrial fibrillation risk. The End Points section and Subgroup Analyses report ventricular-arrhythmia-related events, which are distinct from atrial fibrillation; searches for atrial fibrillation and adverse-event incidence found no passage establishing the claimed signal. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [5] Roncaglioni, 2013, N-3 fatty acids in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors, N Engl J Med source
  • Premisecitation
    § 8 Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli, Italy

    The STRENGTH trial, which utilized the same dose of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation but containing a formulation of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid, was neutral on the composite primary endpoint.

    “Contrarily, the recent STRENGTH trial, which utilized the same dose of O3FA supplementation, but containing a formulation of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), was neutral on the composite primary endpoint.6”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Nicholls, 2020, Effect of high-dose omega-3 fatty acids vs corn oil on major adverse cardiovascular events in patients at high cardiovascular risk: the STRENGTH randomized clinical trial, JAMA source
  • Findingown data
    § 8 Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli, Italy

    There was no significant statistical heterogeneity between the included studies.

    “There were no significant statistical heterogeneity between studies and no publication bias, even if the funnel plot suggested some asymmetry.”
    • Also stated in: § 8 Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli, Italy · plain
      “We also found no heterogeneity and no small study publication bias.”
    • Also stated in: § 8 Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli, Italy · plain
      “Moreover, although placebo arms were often different among the trials, we did not find heterogeneity in the results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 8
  • May combine two claims. 2
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § 8 Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli, Italy

    The funnel plot suggested some asymmetry.

    “There were no significant statistical heterogeneity between studies and no publication bias, even if the funnel plot suggested some asymmetry.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 8 Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli, Italy

    Publication bias for small study effect was assessed by visual examination of funnel plots and quantified by Egger's test and Begg's test.

    “The presence of publication bias for small study effect appraisal was assessed by visual examination of funnel plots and was quantified by Egger’s test and Begg’s test.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § 8 Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli, Italy

    The study conducted a systematic search of randomized controlled trials of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on cardiovascular outcomes, including data on the incidence of atrial fibrillation up to November 2020.

    “We conducted a systematic search of RCTs of O3FA supplementation on CV outcomes, which also included data on the incidence of AF up to November 2020.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data
    § 8 Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli, Italy

    The study lacked a systematic assessment of the haemorrhagic risk of the patients.

    “This study has some limitations such as the lack of systematic haemorrhagic risk of the patients, the lack of a systematic search for AF events in the individual studies, and the fact that some of the studies did not include AF as a prespecified outcome, potentially resulting in under-reporting of AF-related events.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 8 Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli, Italy

    The study conducted a study-level meta-analysis, with individual aspects of the participants not being accounted for.

    “We conducted a study-level meta-analysis, with individual aspects of the participants not being accounted for.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data
    § 8 Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli, Italy

    The sensitivity analysis on the VITAL rhythm trial was limited to results presented at the American Heart Association 2020 because the full data had not been disclosed.

    “Finally, we only included a sensitivity analysis on the VITAL rhythm results presented at the American Heart Association 2020, as the fully data have not been disclosed yet.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data
    § 8 Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli, Italy

    Heterogeneity across studies was assessed with Cochran's Q method and I2 testing.

    “Heterogeneity across studies was assessed with Cochran’s Q method and I2 testing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 8 Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli, Italy

    Omega-3 fatty acids have been previously shown to stabilize the cardiac membrane resulting in protective effects against arrhythmias, including ventricular arrhythmias.

    “In fact, O3FA have been previously shown to stabilize the cardiac membrane resulting in protective effects against arrhythmias, including ventricular arrhythmias.2,8”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [2] Lombardi, 2020, Impact of different doses of omega-3 fatty acids on cardiovascular outcomes: a pairwise and network meta-analysis, Curr Atheroscler Rep source
    • cites [8] 1999, Dietary supplementation with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin E after myocardial infarction: results of the GISSI-Prevenzione trial, Lancet source
8 of 8
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation is used in clinical practice to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in patients with elevated plasma triglycerides.

    “Omega-3 fatty acids (O3FA) supplementation are being utilized in clinical practice to reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in patients with elevated plasma triglycerides.”
    “O3FA supplementation has been utilized to reduce CVD and CVD-related mortality in patients at high CV risk and elevated plasma triglycerides.”
1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 10 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lombardi, M., Carbone, S., Del Buono, M. G., Chiabrando, J. G., Vescovo, G. M., Camilli, M., Montone, R. A., Vergallo, R., Abbate, A., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Dixon, D. L., & Crea, F.
Affiliations
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart , Rome,
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome , Latina,
Corresponding author
Carbone, Salvatore
Venue
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
Published
2021-04-28
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
e69-e70
ISSN
  • 2055-6837 (ISSN-L)
  • 2055-6845
OpenAlex
W3159099931
Cited by
68
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 6
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Career Development Award (19CDA34660318)
  • American Heart Association
  • Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program (UL1TR002649)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
omega-3 fatty acids, dietary supplementation, atrial fibrillation, incident atrial fibrillation risk, cardiovascular outcomes, VITAL trial, triglycerides, cardiac arrhythmias, publication bias, sensitivity analysis, omega-3 index, n-6/n-3 ratio
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Humans, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-19.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-19.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review