Cited by 191Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsHeart Failure Treatment and Management

Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on major cardiovascular events in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus with or without established cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Open access
Marsico, Fabio, Paolillo, Stefania, Gargiulo, Paola, Bruzzese, Dario, Dell’Aversana, Simona, Esposito, Immacolata, Renga, Francesco, Esposito, Luca +4 more·2020·European Heart Journal

Abstract

Aims: Glucose-lowering, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists reduce incidence of major cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). However, randomized clinical trials reported inconsistent effects on myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke, and limited data in DM patients without established CV disease (CVD). Very recently, new relevant evidence was available from additional CV outcome trials (CVOTs) that also included large subgroups of patients with DM without established CVD. Thus, the aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists on major CV events and safety in DM patients with and without established CVD. Methods and results: In this trial-level meta-analysis, we analysed data from randomized placebo-controlled CVOTs assessing efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists in adult patients with Type 2 DM. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ISI Web of Science, SCOPUS, and clinicaltrial.gov databases for eligible trials. Of 360 articles identified and screened for eligibility, seven CVOTs were included, with an overall of 56 004 patients included. The difference in efficacy with respect to the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) primary endpoint (including CV mortality, non-fatal MI, and non-fatal stroke) between patients with established CVD and patients with CV risk factors only was not significant [pooled interaction effect, expressed as ratio of hazard ratio (HR) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85–1.34]. In the analysis of the whole population of DM patients, GLP-1 receptor agonists showed a significant 12% reduction in the hazard of the three-point MACE composite endpoint (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80–0.96) and a significant reduction in the risk of CV mortality (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79–0.98), all-cause mortality (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.97), fatal and non-fatal stroke (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76–0.94), and heart failure (HF) hospitalization (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86–0.97). No significant effect was observed for fatal and non-fatal MI (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.82–1.02), although in a sensitivity analysis, based on a less conservative statistical approach, the pooled HR become statistically significant (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83–1.00; P = 0.039). No excess of hypoglycaemia, pancreatitis, and pancreatic cancer was observed between GLP-1 receptor agonists and placebo. Conclusion: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists significantly reduce MACE, CV and total mortality stroke, and hospitalization for HF, with a trend for reduction of MI, in patients with Type 2 DM with and without established CVD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa082

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Schwarzer G. Meta: an R package for meta-analysis. R. News 2007;7:40-45.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marsico, F., Paolillo, S., Gargiulo, P., Bruzzese, D., Dell’Aversana, S., Esposito, I., Renga, F., Esposito, L., Marciano, C., Dellegrottaglie, S., Iesu, I., & Perrone Filardi, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • Clinica Mediterranea (IT)
  • Istituto Diagnostico Varelli , Via Cornelia dei Gracchi, 65, I-80126 Naples, Italy
  • Villa dei Fiori Clinic, Corso Italia , I-80011, Acerra, Naples, Italy
  • Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II , Via Pansini, 5, I-80131 Naples, Italy
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2020-02-20
Volume
41
Issue
35
Pages
3346-3358
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W3007686565
Cited by
191
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 35
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, type 2 diabetes, major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular outcomes, cardiovascular disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalization, drug safety, cardiovascular risk stratification, cardiovascular outcome trials, glycemic control, weight loss, blood pressure, lipid lowering, antithrombotic therapy, antihypertensive therapy
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review