Cited by 57Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

The relationship between glycaemic variability and cardiovascular complications in patients with acute myocardial infarction and type 2 diabetes: a report from the DIGAMI 2 trial

Mellbin, Linda G., Malmberg, Klas, Rydén, Lars, Wedel, Hans, Vestberg, Daniel, Lind, Marcus·2013·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: Hyperglycaemia during hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a risk predictor, but attempts to improve the prognosis by insulin-based glucose control have not been consistently successful. Increased glycaemic variability, a potential effect of insulin treatment, has been linked to a worse prognosis in critically ill patients. The present aim was to study the possibility of such a relation in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and AMI. METHOD AND RESULTS: We studied 578 T2DM patients who had glucose levels measured hourly while receiving an insulin-glucose infusion during the first 48 h of hospitalization for AMI. Three measures of glycaemic variability: root mean square error (RMSE), range, and slope were studied in relation to a composite endpoint of mortality, stroke, and reinfarction and to mortality. In unadjusted analyses, the mean level of glycaemic variability did not differ between patients who died during 12 months of follow-up compared with those who survived. In a Cox regression model adjusting for age and previous congestive heart failure, there was no increased risk for the composite endpoint associated with increased glycaemic variability; RMSE: hazard ratio (HR) 1.09 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.27; P = 0.28], range: HR 1.01 (95% CI: 0.98-1.05; P = 0.47), and slope: HR 1.01 (95% CI: 0.99-1.04; P = 0.40). There was furthermore no increased risk in mortality; RMSE HR 1.14 (95% CI: 0.93-1.38; P = 0.21), range HR 1.03 (95% CI: 0.98-1.08; P = 0.28), and slope HR 1.01 (95% CI: 0.98-1.04; P = 0.55). CONCLUSION: The 1-year risk for death, reinfarction, or stroke did not relate to glycaemic variability in T2DM patients with AMI treated with insulin infusion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs384

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In DIGAMI 2, there was no association between glycemic variability and complications (composite endpoint: RMSE p=0.28, HR 1.09, 0.93-1.27; mortality p=0.21, HR 1.14, 0.93-1.38).

    “No association between GV and complications.Composite endpoint: RMSE p=0.28, HR 1.09 (0.93–1.27), mortality p=0.21, HR 1.14 (0.93–1.38).”
  • In the DIGAMI 2 study, there was no relationship between glycemic variability and acute cardiovascular complications in 578 patients with type 2 diabetes.

    “reported no relationship between GV and acute cardiovascular complications in 578 patients with T2D.53”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mellbin, L. G., Malmberg, K., Rydén, L., Wedel, H., Vestberg, D., & Lind, M.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Nordic School of Public Health (SE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Mellbin, Linda G.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2012-11-09
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
374-379
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2125208805
Cited by
57
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
glycemic variability, acute myocardial infarction, type 2 diabetes, insulin infusion, glycemic control, root mean square error, mortality, reinfarction, stroke, cardiovascular complications
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glucose, Hospitalization, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Infusions, Intravenous, Insulin, Male, Myocardial Infarction, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Stroke, Diabetic Cardiomyopathies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review