Cited by 132Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Oral anticoagulation therapy after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation and the risk of thromboembolism and serious bleeding: long-term follow-up in nationwide cohort of Denmark

Open access
Karasoy, Deniz, Gislason, Gunnar Hilmar, Hansen, Jim, Johannessen, Arne, Køber, Lars, Hvidtfeldt, Morten, Özcan, Cengiz, Torp-Pedersen, Christian +1 more·2015·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the long-term risk of thromboembolism and serious bleeding associated with oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy beyond 3 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Linking Danish administrative registries, 4050 patients undergoing first-time RFA (2000-11) were identified. Risk of thromboembolism and serious bleeding according to OAC therapy were analysed by incidence rates (presented per 100 person-years) and Cox proportional-hazard models. The median age was 59.5 years (interquartile range, IQR: 52.8-65.2); 26.5% were females. During a median follow-up of 3.4 years (IQR: 2.0-5.6), 71 (1.8%) thromboembolism cases were identified, where incidence rates with and without OAC were 0.56 (0.40-0.78)95%CI and 0.64 (0.46-0.89)95%CI, respectively. Oral anticoagulation discontinuation remained insignificant [hazard ratio 1.42(0.86-2.35)95%CI] in multivariable analysis. Beyond 3 months after RFA 87 (2.1%) serious bleedings occurred; incidence rates with and without OAC were 0.99 (0.77-1.27)95%CI and 0.44 (0.29-0.65)95%CI, respectively. Oral anticoagulation therapy was significantly associated with serious bleeding risk [hazard ratio 2.05(1.25-3.35)95%CI]. In an age- and gender-matched cohort (1 : 4) of 15 848 non-ablated AF patients receiving rhythm-control therapy, thromboembolic rates with and without OAC were 1.34 (1.21-1.49)95%CI and 2.14 (1.98-2.30)95%CI, respectively. Adjusted incidence rate ratio was 0.53 (0.43-0.65)95%CI favouring RFA cohort. CONCLUSION: Thromboembolic risk beyond 3 months after RFA was relatively low compared with a matched non-ablated AF cohort. With cautious interpretation due to low number of events, serious bleeding risk associated with OAC seems to outweigh the benefits of thromboembolic risk reduction. Randomized studies are warranted to test our results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu421

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kornej J, Hindricks G, Kosiuk J, Arya A, Sommer P, Husser D, Rolf S, Richter S, Piorkowski C, Gaspar T, Lip GY, Bollmann A. Renal dysfunction, stroke risk scores (CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and R2CHADS2), and the risk of thromboembolic events after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the Leipzig Heart Center AF Ab- lation Registry. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2013;6:868 -874.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karasoy, D., Gislason, G. H., Hansen, J., Johannessen, A., Køber, L., Hvidtfeldt, M., Özcan, C., Torp-Pedersen, C., & Hansen, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Gentofte Hospital (DK)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Rigshospitalet (DK)
Corresponding author
Karasoy, Deniz
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2014-11-03
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
307-315
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2075511073
Cited by
132
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
FWCI
8.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Hjerteforeningen
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF12OC1015957)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Keywords
oral anticoagulation, atrial fibrillation, radiofrequency ablation, thromboembolism, major bleeding, anticoagulation discontinuation, long-term follow-up, rhythm control, stroke prevention, bleeding risk, incidence rates, hazard ratio
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Aged, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Combined Modality Therapy, Denmark, Female, Hemorrhage, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Thromboembolism, Catheter Ablation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review