The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): one-year angiographic and clinical results
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: Optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) is a recently developed, light-based, high-resolution intravascular imaging technique. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a widely used, conventional imaging technique for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of OFDI-guided PCI compared with IVUS-guided PCI in terms of clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We did a prospective, multicentre, randomized (ratio 1:1), active-controlled, non-inferiority study to compare head-to-head OFDI vs. IVUS in patients undergoing PCI with a second generation drug-eluting stent. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel related myocardial infarction, and ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularization until 12 months after the PCI. The major secondary endpoint was angiographic binary restenosis at 8 months. We randomly allocated 829 patients to receive OFDI-guided PCI (n = 414) or IVUS-guided PCI (n = 415). Target vessel failure occurred in 21 (5.2%) of 401 patients undergoing OFDI-guided PCI, and 19 (4.9%) of 390 patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI, demonstrating non-inferiority of OFDI-guided PCI to IVUS-guided PCI (hazard ratio 1.07, upper limit of one-sided 95% confidence interval 1.80; Pnon-inferiority = 0.042). With 89.8% angiographic follow-up, the rate of binary restenosis was comparable between OFDI-guided PCI and IVUS-guided PCI (in-stent: 1.6% vs. 1.6%, P = 1.00; and in-segment: 6.2% vs. 6.0%, P = 1.00). CONCLUSION: The 12-month clinical outcome in patients undergoing OFDI-guided PCI was non-inferior to that of patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI. Both OFDI-guided and IVUS-guided PCI yielded excellent angiographic and clinical results, with very low rates of 8-month angiographic binary restenosis and 12-month target vessel failure. CLINICAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01873027.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2014) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278 · Cited by 4,314
2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization
Kolh, P., Windecker, S., Alfonso, F., Collet, J.-P., Cremer, J., Falk, V., Filippatos, G., Hamm, C., Head, S. J., Jüni, P., et al. (2014) · European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezu366 · Cited by 4,199
Ali, Z. A., Maehara, A., Généreux, P., Shlofmitz, R. A., Fabbiocchi, F., Nazif, T. M., Guagliumi, G., Meraj, P. M., Alfonso, F., Samady, H., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31922-5 · Cited by 658
Self-citationHong, S.-J., Kim, B.-K., Shin, D.-H., Nam, C.-M., Kim, J.-S., Ko, Y.-G., Choi, D., Kang, T.-S., Kang, W.-C., Her, A.-Y., et al. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.15454 · Cited by 621
Prati, F., Guagliumi, G., Mintz, G. S., Costa, M., Regar, E., Akasaka, T., Barlis, P., Tearney, G. J., Jang, I.-K., Arbustini, E., et al. (2012) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs095 · Cited by 400
Self-citationPrati, F., Di Vito, L., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Occhipinti, M., La Manna, A., Tamburino, C., Burzotta, F., Trani, C., Porto, I., Ramazzotti, V., et al. (2012) · EuroIntervention · doi:10.4244/eijv8i7a125 · Cited by 381
Wijns, W., Shite, J., Jones, M. R., Lee, S. W.-L., Price, M. J., Fabbiocchi, F., Barbato, E., Akasaka, T., Bezerra, H., & Holmes, D. (2015) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv367 · Cited by 236
Self-citation
Cited by
Lawton, J. S., Tamis-Holland, J. E., Bangalore, S., Bates, E. R., Beckie, T. M., Bischoff, J. M., Bittl, J. A., Cohen, M. G., DiMaio, J. M., Don, C. W., et al. (2022) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001038 · Cited by 829
Räber, L., Mintz, G. S., Koskinas, K. C., Johnson, T. W., Holm, N. R., Onuma, Y., Radu, M. D., Joner, M., Yu, B., Jia, H., et al. (2018) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy285 · Cited by 770
Rao, S. V., O’Donoghue, M. L., Ruel, M., Rab, T., Tamis-Holland, J. E., Alexander, J. H., Baber, U., Baker, H., Cohen, M. G., Cruz-Ruiz, M., et al. (2025) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001309 · Cited by 625
Intravascular Imaging–Guided or Angiography-Guided Complex PCI
Lee, J. M., Choi, K. H., Song, Y. B., Lee, J.-Y., Lee, S.-J., Lee, S. Y., Kim, S. M., Yun, K. H., Cho, J. Y., Kim, C. J., et al. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2216607 · Cited by 572
OCT or Angiography Guidance for PCI in Complex Bifurcation Lesions
Holm, N. R., Andreasen, L. D., Neghabat, O., Laanmets, P., Kumsars, I., Bennett, J., Olsen, N. T., Odenstedt, J., Hoffmann, P., Dens, J., et al. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2307770 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Kubo, T., Shinke, T., Okamura, T., Hibi, K., Nakazawa, G., Morino, Y., Shite, J., Fusazaki, T., Otake, H., Kozuma, K., Ioji, T., Kaneda, H., Serikawa, T., Kataoka, T., Okada, H., Akasaka, T., & OPINION Investigators
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-06-27
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 3139-3147
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- 1522-9645
- OpenAlex
- W2729505993
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 21.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): one-year angiographic and clinical results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx351
- The paper
- Kubo, T., Shinke, T., Okamura, T., Hibi, K., Nakazawa, G., Morino, Y., Shite, J., Fusazaki, T., Otake, H., Kozuma, K., Ioji, T., Kaneda, H., Serikawa, T., Kataoka, T., Okada, H., Akasaka, T., & OPINION Investigators. (2017). Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): one-year angiographic and clinical results. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx351
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
