CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 320Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyCardiovascular Effects of Exercise

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mortality reduction with physical activity in patients with and without cardiovascular disease

Open access
Jeong, Sang-Woo, Kim, Sun-Hwa, Kang, Si-Hyuck, Kim, Hee-Jun, Yoon, Chang-Hwan, Youn, Tae-Jin, Chae, In-Ho·2019·European Heart Journal
DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz564PMC PMC6855138
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

AIMS: Physical activity has been shown to reduce mortality in a dose-response fashion. Current guidelines recommend 500-1000 metabolic equivalent task (MET)-min per week of regular physical activity. This study aimed to compare the impact of leisure-time physical activity on mortality in primary versus secondary cardiovascular prevention. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included a total of 131 558 and 310 240 subjects with and without cardiovascular disease (CVD), respectively, from a population-based cohort. Leisure-time physical activity was measured by self-report questionnaires. The study subjects were followed-up for a median of 5.9 years, and the main study outcome was all-cause mortality. There was an inverse relationship between the physical activity level and the mortality risk in both groups. The benefit in the secondary prevention group was shown to be greater than that in the primary prevention group: every 500 MET-min/week increase in physical activity resulted in a 14% and 7% risk reduction in mortality in the secondary and primary prevention groups, respectively (interaction P < 0.001). In addition, while individuals without CVD benefited the most between 1 and 500 MET-min/week of physical activity, the benefit in those with CVD continued above 500 - 1000 MET-min/week. The adjusted mortality risk of individuals with CVD who performed a high level of physical activity (≥1000 MET-min/week) was shown to be comparable to or lower than that of their counterparts without CVD. CONCLUSION: Individuals with CVD may benefit from physical activity to a greater extent than do healthy subjects without CVD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz564

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 1 Incidence rate of mortality per 1000 person-years according to physical activity level stratified by cardiovascular disease. Numbers in the box plot indicate incidence rates per 1000 person-years. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 1 Incidence rate of mortality per 1000 person-years according to physical activity level stratified by cardiovascular disease. Numbers in the box plot indicate incidence rates per 1000 person-years. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Distribution and adjusted risk of mortality according to physical activity levels stratified by cardiovascular disease. Cox regression analysis with physical activity classified as a categorical variable: 0 (totally sedentary), <500, 500 to 999, 1000 to 1499, and ≥1500 MET-min/week. The statistical models were adjusted for age, sex, income level, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, smoking, renal disease, end-stage renal disease, liver disease, any malignancy, fasting blood sugar, and serum creatinine levels. The red and blue lines indicate hazard ratios for subjects with and without CVD, respectively. Bar graph indicates the number of study subjects in each category.
Figure 2 Distribution and adjusted risk of mortality according to physical activity levels stratified by cardiovascular disease. Cox regression analysis with physical activity classified as a categorical variable: 0 (totally sedentary), <500, 500 to 999, 1000 to 1499, and ≥1500 MET-min/week. The statistical models were adjusted for age, sex, income level, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, smoking, renal disease, end-stage renal disease, liver disease, any malignancy, fasting blood sugar, and serum creatinine levels. The red and blue lines indicate hazard ratios for subjects with and without CVD, respectively. Bar graph indicates the number of study subjects in each category.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Non-linear relationship between physical activity and mortality risk according to the presence of cardiovascular disease and expected 10-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease. Restricted cubic spline curves were constructed with regard to physical activity treated as a continuous variable. Adjusted hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals are illustrated. The red, orange, green, and blue lines and shades indicate subjects with cardiovascular disease and subjects without cardiovascular disease who have an estimated 10-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease ≥10%, 5–10%, and <5%, respectively.
Figure 3 Non-linear relationship between physical activity and mortality risk according to the presence of cardiovascular disease and expected 10-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease. Restricted cubic spline curves were constructed with regard to physical activity treated as a continuous variable. Adjusted hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals are illustrated. The red, orange, green, and blue lines and shades indicate subjects with cardiovascular disease and subjects without cardiovascular disease who have an estimated 10-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease ≥10%, 5–10%, and <5%, respectively.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2018, 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report
  2. 2010, Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 320

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Jeong, S.-W., Kim, S.-H., Kang, S.-H., Kim, H.-J., Yoon, C.-H., Youn, T.-J., & Chae, I.-H.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Chung-Ang University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kang, Si-Hyuck
ORCID
Venue
European Heart Journal
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2019-09-01
Volume
40
Issue
43
Pages
3547-3555
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
DOI
10.1093/eurheartj/ehz564
PMC
PMC6855138
OpenAlex
W2970775832
Cited by
320
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 3
FWCI
21.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Basic Science Research Programme
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (2019R1C1C1006611)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Keywords
physical activity, leisure-time physical activity, cardiovascular disease, all-cause mortality, primary prevention, secondary prevention, metabolic equivalent minutes, dose-response relationship, cardiovascular risk reduction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Leisure Activities, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Prevention, Risk Factors, Health Behavior, Exercise, Survival Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Risk Reduction Behavior, Secondary Prevention, Self Report, Protective Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review