Cited by 25Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Effects of Exercise

Blood pressure response to graded bicycle exercise in males and females across the age and fitness spectrum

Open access
Janssens, Kristel, Foulkes, Stephen J, Mitchell, Amy M, Dausin, Christophe, Van Soest, Sofie, Spencer, Luke, Rowe, Stephanie J, D’Ambrosio, Paolo +7 more·2025·European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Abstract

Aims: Blood pressure (BP) responses to exercise are frequently measured, with the concern that greater increases are a marker of disease. We sought to characterize the normal exercise BP response in healthy adults and its relationships with age, sex, and fitness. Methods and results: Five hundred and eighty-nine participants [median age 46 (interquartile range 24–56) years, 81% male] underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing with repeated, automated BP measures. An exaggerated maximal systolic BP (SBPmax) was defined from current guidelines as ≥210 mmHg in males and ≥190 mmHg in females. Individual linear regression analyses defined the relationship between BP and workload (W; SBP/W-slope and DBP/W-slope). Participants with or without an exaggerated SBPmax and above- or below-median SBP/W-slope were compared. An exaggerated SBPmax was found in 51% of males and 64% of females and was more prevalent in endurance-trained athletes (males 58%, females 72%, P < 0.001). The mean SBP/W-slope was lower in males (0.24 ± 0.10 mmHg/W) than females (0.27 ± 0.12 mmHg/W, P = 0.031). In both sexes, peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) was inversely correlated with SBP/W-slope (P < 0.01). Those with an exaggerated SBPmax and below-median SBP/W-slope were 10 years younger and had a 20% higher VO2peak, on average (P < 0.001). A non-exaggerated SBPmax and above-median SBP/W-slope was observed in older individuals with the lowest VO2peak. Conclusion: In a large cohort of healthy individuals, an exaggerated SBPmax was common and associated with higher fitness. In contrast, higher SBP indexed to W was associated with older age, lower fitness, and female sex. Thus, sex, age, and fitness should be considered when evaluating BP response to exercise. Registration: Pro@Heart: NCT05164328, ACTRN12618000716268; ProAFHeart: ACTRN12618000711213; Master@Heart: NCT03711539

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae262

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]14. Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). Circulation 2002; 106 :1883-1892.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janssens, K., Foulkes, S. J., Mitchell, A. M., Dausin, C., Van Soest, S., Spencer, L., Rowe, S. J., D’Ambrosio, P., Elliott, A. D., Van Puyvelde, T., Parr, E. B., Willems, R., Heidbuchel, H., Claessen, G., & La Gerche, A.
Affiliations
  • St Vincents Institute of Medical Research (AU)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Department of Cardiology, UZ Leuven , Leuven ,
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU)
  • Heart, Exercise and Research Trials (HEART) Lab, St. Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research , 9 Princes Street, Fitzroy, Melbourne, VIC 3065 ,
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Antwerp , Antwerp ,
  • Hasselt University (BE)
Corresponding author
Janssens, Kristel
Venue
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Published
2024-08-08
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
43-51
ISSN
  • 2047-4873 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-4881
OpenAlex
W4401447186
Cited by
25
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 1
FWCI
12.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
  • Fund for Scientific Research Flanders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Investigator Grant (APP 2027105)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Keywords
blood pressure response to exercise, systolic blood pressure, sex differences, age differences, cardiorespiratory fitness, peak oxygen uptake, endurance athletes, healthy adults, reference values, older adults, sex differences in hypertension risk
MeSH terms
Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Adult, Age Factors, Bicycling, Blood Pressure, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Fitness, Sex Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review