Cited by 88Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Anselmino, Matteo, Matta, Mario, D'ascenzo, Fabrizio, Pappone, Carlo, Santinelli, Vincenzo, Bunch, T. Jared, Neumann, Thomas, Schilling, Richard J. +10 more·2015·Europace

Abstract

AIMS: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and atrial fibrillation (AF) share pathophysiological links, as supported by the high prevalence of AF within DM patients. Catheter ablation of AF (AFCA) is an established therapeutic option for rhythm control in drug resistant symptomatic patients. Its efficacy and safety among patients with DM is based on small populations, and long-term outcome is unknown. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess safety and long-term outcome of AFCA in DM patients, focusing on predictors of recurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and observational studies including patients with DM undergoing AFCA were screened and included if matching inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fifteen studies were included, adding up to 1464 patients. Mean follow-up was 27 (20-33) months. Overall complication rate was 3.5 (1.5-5.0)%. Efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm at follow-up end was 66 (58-73)%. Meta-regression analysis revealed that advanced age (P < 0.001), higher body mass index (P < 0.001), and higher basal glycated haemoglobin level (P < 0.001) related to higher incidence of arrhythmic recurrences. Performing AFCA lead to a reduction of patients requiring treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) from 55 (46-74)% at baseline to 29 (17-41)% (P < 0.001) at follow-up end. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation of AF safety and efficacy in DM patients is similar to general population, especially when performed in younger patients with satisfactory glycemic control. Catheter ablation of AF reduces the amount of patients requiring AADs, an additional benefit in this population commonly exposed to adverse effects of AF pharmacological treatments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/euv214

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diabetes is probably not the most potent independent risk factor for stroke in atrial fibrillation compared with the other items in the CHA2DS2-VASc score.

    “Diabetes is probably not the most potent independent risk factor for stroke in AF compared with the other items in the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score, but it is included in this risk-stratification tool, giving a point alongside most other items.600,618,[622][623][624]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008 -12.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anselmino, M., Matta, M., D'ascenzo, F., Pappone, C., Santinelli, V., Bunch, T. J., Neumann, T., Schilling, R. J., Hunter, R. J., Noelker, G., Fiala, M., Frontera, A., Thomas, G., Katritsis, D., Jais, P., Weerasooriya, R., Kalman, J. M., & Gaita, F.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT)
  • Maria Cecilia Hospital (IT)
  • Intermountain Healthcare (US)
  • Kerckhoff Klinik (DE)
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia (DE)
  • Nemocnice Podlesí (CZ)
  • University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Athens Euroclinic (GR)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
Venue
Europace
Published
2015-10
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
1518-1525
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W1890486457
Cited by
88
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, diabetes mellitus, arrhythmia recurrence, antiarrhythmic drugs, procedural complications, HbA1c, body mass index, old age, long-term outcomes, sinus rhythm maintenance
MeSH terms
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Humans, Recurrence, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review