Cited by 63Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyHealth disparities and outcomesReligion and Society Interactions

Health and religiosity among Israeli Jews

Shmueli, A.·2007·The European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this paper is to explore the connection between self-reported health and religiosity among Israeli Jews, using several self-reported health measures. METHODS: Data were collected by two health surveys covering 1999 individuals in 1993 and 2505 individuals in 2000, representing the population of Jewish Israelis aged 45-75 years residing in urban communities in those years. Self-reported health was measured by (i) reported chronic conditions, (ii) the SF-36 instrument, and (iii) a visual analogue scale of health-related quality of life. Religiosity was measured by a self-reported five-category scale. RESULTS: Controlling for a large array of socio-demographic characteristics, while no religiosity gradient was found in reported chronic morbidity, religious persons generally report worse health than secular persons on the other measures. The gap is larger in the SF-36's role-performance scales, and among women and Israelis from Asian-African origin. DISCUSSION: The mixed results are consistent with the ambiguity of the religiosity effect on health reported in recent surveys. However, trying to reconcile between longer life expectancy of religious persons found in earlier Israeli and other research and poorer reported health found above, the paper emphasizes the possible differences in the perception of 'normal' life and roles, and argues that the SF-36 health measures might suffer from a religiosity-related reporting heterogeneity, distorting their association with mortality in the population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/ckl105

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Considering the 33 highest quality studies, 13 (39%) reported significantly better physical functioning among those who were more R/S (including one study at a trend level).

    “Considering the 33 highest quality studies, 13 (39%) reported significantly better physical functioning among those who were more R/S (including one study at a trend level) [483–495], six (18%) found worse functioning [496–501], and five studies (15%) reported mixed results [82, 124, 502–504] (significant positive and negative associations, depending on R/S characteristic).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shmueli, A.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Shmueli, A.
Venue
The European Journal of Public Health
Published
2006-07-28
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
104-111
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W2130583481
Cited by
63
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 41 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
religiosity, self-reported health, Israeli Jews, chronic disease, health-related quality of life, SF-36, role performance, secularism, health perception, life expectancy, women, immigrant origin
MeSH terms
Aged, Ethnicity, Female, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Israel, Jews, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion, Self Disclosure, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Urban Population

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review