Cited by 49Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentCrime Patterns and Interventions

Evaluation of a German version of the Strengthening Families Programme 10-14: a randomised controlled trial

Baldus, Christiane, Thomsen, Monika, Sack, Peter-Michael, Bröning, Sonja, Arnaud, Nicolas, Daubmann, Anne, Thomasius, Rainer·2016·The European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of a German adaptation of the Strengthening Families Programme 10-14 (SFP 10-14; Familien Stärken). METHODS: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing the German SFP version consisting of seven sessions and four booster-sessions with a minimal intervention on parenting as control condition. Outcomes comprise measures of adolescent substance use (initiation) and behaviour problems and are assessed at baseline, after programme delivery and at 6- and 18-month follow-ups. Primary outcomes were lifetime tobacco, alcohol and cannabis use at 18 months. Data of n = 292 families were analysed using baseline adjusted logistic regressions and mixed models. RESULTS: We observed reduced rates of lifetime tobacco use in analyses with follow-up respondents, but not in data using the complete intention to treat sample with multiple imputation estimates for missing data. Parents reported fewer adolescent behaviour problems in analyses with the total sample and multiple imputed data, but not in data with follow-up respondents only. There were no other significant effects of SFP 10-14. CONCLUSION: Overall the medium size effects found in previous US trials could not be replicated in a German context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/ckw082

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several US-based interventions targeting youth development, education and crime reduction have struggled to replicate their positive effects in the UK and Europe, due in part to differences in service systems, cultural norms and school environments.

    “Several US-based interventions targeting youth development, education and crime reduction have struggled to replicate their positive effects in the UK and Europe more widely. This is arguably due in part to differences in service systems, cultural norms and school environments, which complicate implementation (e.g., Skärstrand et al., 2014; Baldus et al., 2016; Humayun et al., 2017; Fonagy et al.,”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baldus, C., Thomsen, M., Sack, P.-M., Bröning, S., Arnaud, N., Daubmann, A., & Thomasius, R.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Venue
The European Journal of Public Health
Published
2016-07-03
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
953-959
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W2467160340
Cited by
49
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
parenting support, adolescent substance use, tobacco use, alcohol consumption, cannabis use, adolescent behavior problems, program adaptation, German families
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Age Factors, Alcoholism, Mental Disorders, Marijuana Abuse, Child, Female, Germany, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Tobacco Use Disorder, Program Evaluation, Parenting, Substance-Related Disorders, Cultural Competency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review