Cited by 3DNA Repair MechanismsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

New components of the community-based DNA-repair mechanism in Sulfolobales

Open access
Recalde, Alejandra, Wagner, Alexander, Sivabalasarma, Shamphavi, Yurmashava, Anastasiya, Fehr, Nayeli Phycilia, Thurm, Rebecca, Le, Thuong Ngoc, Köebler, Christin +3 more·2025·microLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

After exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light, Sulfolobus acidocaldarius cells aggregate in a species-specific manner to exchange DNA and repair double-strand breaks via homologous recombination. The formation of cell–cell interactions is mediated by Ups pili. DNA exchange subsequently occurs through the Crenarchaeal system for exchange of DNA (Ced), which imports DNA. To identify novel players in these processes, we investigated that several genes upregulated after UV exposure, by creating in-frame deletion mutants and performing cell aggregation and DNA exchange assays. This led to the identification of two novel components involved in the Ups and Ced systems: UpsC, a minor pilin of the Ups pili, and CedD, a VirD4-like ATPase essential for DNA import. Altogether, these findings provide new insights into the DNA damage response mechanisms in Sulfolobales.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/femsml/uqaf002

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Recalde, A., Wagner, A., Sivabalasarma, S., Yurmashava, A., Fehr, N. P., Thurm, R., Le, T. N., Köebler, C., Wassmer, B., Albers, S.-V., & van Wolferen, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Molecular Biology of Archaea, Institute of Biology II—Microbiology, University of Freiburg , 79104 Freiburg ,
Corresponding author
Albers, Sonja-Verena
Venue
microLife
Published
2025
Volume
6
Pages
uqaf002-uqaf002
ISSN
2633-6693 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406605637
Cited by
3
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • microLife (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • DFG (426849454, AL1206)
  • University of Freiburg
  • VW Momentum (94993)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Ministry of Education and Training (911)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
Sulfolobales, DNA repair, homologous recombination, DNA double-strand break repair, cell aggregation, UV-induced DNA damage, DNA damage response, archaea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review