Cited by 114Evolution and Genetic DynamicsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Divergence Involving Global Regulatory Gene Mutations in an Escherichia coli Population Evolving under Phosphate Limitation

Open access
Wang, Lei, Spira, Beny, Zhou, Zhemin, Feng, Lu, Maharjan, Ram P., Li, Xiaomin, Li, Fangfang, McKenzie, Christopher +2 more·2010·Genome Biology and Evolution

Abstract

Many of the important changes in evolution are regulatory in nature. Sequenced bacterial genomes point to flexibility in regulatory circuits but we do not know how regulation is remodeled in evolving bacteria. Here, we study the regulatory changes that emerge in populations evolving under controlled conditions during experimental evolution of Escherichia coli in a phosphate-limited chemostat culture. Genomes were sequenced from five clones with different combinations of phenotypic properties that coexisted in a population after 37 days. Each of the distinct isolates contained a different mutation in 1 of 3 highly pleiotropic regulatory genes (hfq, spoT, or rpoS). The mutations resulted in dissimilar proteomic changes, consistent with the documented effects of hfq, spoT, and rpoS mutations. The different mutations do share a common benefit, however, in that the mutations each redirect cellular resources away from stress responses that are redundant in a constant selection environment. The hfq mutation lowers several individual stress responses as well the small RNA-dependent activation of rpoS translation and hence general stress resistance. The spoT mutation reduces ppGpp levels, decreasing the stringent response as well as rpoS expression. The mutations in and upstream of rpoS resulted in partial or complete loss of general stress resistance. Our observations suggest that the degeneracy at the core of bacterial stress regulation provides alternative solutions to a common evolutionary challenge. These results can explain phenotypic divergence in a constant environment and also how evolutionary jumps and adaptive radiations involve altered gene regulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gbe/evq035

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mutational robustness can have a positive effect on evolvability, depending on the population size and network architecture.

    “Although counterintuitive at first, it was shown that mutational robustness can have a positive effect on evolvability, depending on the population size and network architecture [41,136].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, L., Spira, B., Zhou, Z., Feng, L., Maharjan, R. P., Li, X., Li, F., McKenzie, C., Reeves, P. R., & Ferenci, T.
Affiliations
  • Nankai University (CN)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Ferenci, Thomas
Venue
Genome Biology and Evolution
Published
2010-01-01
Volume
2
Pages
478-487
ISSN
1759-6653 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074203599
Cited by
114
References
51
Citations by year
2024: 24 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Genome Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scientific Electronic Library Online (São Paulo Research Foundation, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (30870070, 973 Program, 863 Program, 30870078, 30771175, 30530010)
  • National High-tech Research and Development Program
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China
  • National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (30788001)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA020703)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
Escherichia coli, phosphate limitation, experimental evolution, Hfq, SPOT, RpoS, stringent response, ppGpp, small RNA, stress response, phenotypic divergence, pleiotropy, chemostat culture, proteomics, adaptive radiation
MeSH terms
Bacterial Proteins, Escherichia coli, Genes, Bacterial, Guanosine Tetraphosphate, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Phenotype, Phosphates, Pyrophosphatases, Sigma Factor, Stress, Physiological, Directed Molecular Evolution, Proteome, Escherichia coli Proteins, Host Factor 1 Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review