Cited by 145Evolution and Genetic DynamicsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Evolution of global regulatory networks during a long‐term experiment with Escherichia coli

Philippe, Nadège, Crozat, Estelle, Lenski, Richard E., Schneider, Dominique·2007·BioEssays

Abstract

Evolution has shaped all living organisms on Earth, although many details of this process are shrouded in time. However, it is possible to see, with one's own eyes, evolution as it happens by performing experiments in defined laboratory conditions with microbes that have suitably fast generations. The longest‐running microbial evolution experiment was started in 1988, at which time twelve populations were founded by the same strain of Escherichia coli. Since then, the populations have been serially propagated and have evolved for tens of thousands of generations in the same environment. The populations show numerous parallel phenotypic changes, and such parallelism is a hallmark of adaptive evolution. Many genetic targets of natural selection have been identified, revealing a high level of genetic parallelism as well. Beneficial mutations affect all levels of gene regulation in the cells including individual genes and operons all the way to global regulatory networks. Of particular interest, two highly interconnected networks—governing DNA superhelicity and the stringent response—have been demonstrated to be deeply involved in the phenotypic and genetic adaptation of these experimental populations. BioEssays 29:846–860, 2007. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bies.20629

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High mutation rates and mutator strains can emerge naturally during laboratory evolution and contribute to the formation of genetic novelty.

    “Interestingly, it was shown that high mutation rates and mutator strains can emerge naturally during laboratory evolution and contribute to the formation of genetic novelty [33,73,139-141].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Philippe, N., Crozat, E., Lenski, R. E., & Schneider, D.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Schneider, Dominique
Venue
BioEssays
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08-09
Volume
29
Issue
9
Pages
846-860
ISSN
  • 0265-9247 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-1878
OpenAlex
W2051116946
Cited by
145
References
84
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BioEssays (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
Escherichia coli, gene expression regulation, parallel evolution, adaptive evolution, DNA superhelicity, stringent response, operon, serial propagation, beneficial mutations, natural selection
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Biological, Escherichia coli, Biological Evolution, Genotype, Mutation, Phenotype, Phylogeny, Research, Selection, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Escherichia coli Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review