The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Permutation Tests for Multiple Loci Affecting a Quantitative Character
Open accessAbstract
The problem of detecting minor quantitative trait loci (QTL) responsible for genetic variation not explained by major QTL is of importance in the complete dissection of quantitative characters. Two extensions of the permutation-based method for estimating empirical threshold values are presented. These methods, the conditional empirical threshold (CET) and the residual empirical threshold (RET), yield critical values that can be used to construct tests for the presence of minor QTL effects while accounting for effects of known major QTL. The CET provides a completely nonparametric test through conditioning on markers linked to major QTL. It allows for general nonadditive interactions among QTL, but its practical application is restricted to regions of the genome that are unlinked to the major QTL. The RET assumes a structural model for the effect of major QTL, and a threshold is constructed using residuals from this structural model. The search space for minor QTL is unrestricted, and RET-based tests may be more powerful than the CET-based test when the structural model is approximately true.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci.
Zeng, Z. B. (1994) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/136.4.1457 · Cited by 3,182
Haley, C. S., & Knott, S. A. (1992) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.1992.131 · Cited by 1,991
Martínez, O., & Curnow, R. N. (1992) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00222330 · Cited by 355
Cited by
PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.
Purcell, S., Neale, B., Todd-Brown, K., Thomas, L., Ferreira, M. A. R., Bender, D., Maller, J., Sklar, P., de Bakker, P. I. W., Daly, M. J., et al. (2007) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/519795 · Cited by 34,089
The Genetic Architecture of Quantitative Traits
Mackay, T. F. C. (2001) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.090633 · Cited by 1,106
Mammalian circadian biology: elucidating genome-wide levels of temporal organization
Lowrey, P. L., & Takahashi, J. S. (2004) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.5.061903.175925 · Cited by 976
Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species
Noor, M. A. F., Grams, K. L., Bertucci, L. A., & Reiland, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.221274498 · Cited by 911
Finding genes that underlie complex traits.
Glazier, A. M., Nadeau, J. H., & Aitman, T. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1076641 · Cited by 855
Metadata
- Authors
- Doerge, R. W., & Churchill, G. A.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 285-294
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1841573652
- Cited by
- 1,131
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Permutation Tests for Multiple Loci Affecting a Quantitative Character. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/142.1.285
- The paper
- Doerge, R. W., & Churchill, G. A. (1996). Permutation Tests for Multiple Loci Affecting a Quantitative Character. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/142.1.285
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.