The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A General Method for Identifying Recessive Diploid-Specific Mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Its Application to the Isolation of Mutants Blocked at Intermediate Stages of Meiotic Prophase and Characterization of a New Gene SAE2
Abstract
We describe a general new approach for identifying recessive mutations that affect diploid strains of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the application of this method to the identification of mutations that confer an intermediate block in meiotic prophase chromosome metabolism. The method uses a temperature-sensitive conjugation mutation ste7-1 in combination with homothallism. The mutations of interest confer a defect in spore formation that is dependent upon a gene required for initiation of meiotic recombination and development of meiosis-specific chromosome structure (SPO11). Identified in this screen were null mutations of the DMC1 gene, nonnull mutations of RAD50 (rad50S, and mutations in three new genes designated SAE1, SAE2 and SAE3 (Sporulation in the Absence of Spo Eleven). Molecular characterization of the SAE2 gene and characterization of meiotic and mitotic phenotypes of sae2 mutants are also presented. The phenotypes conferred by a sae2 null mutation are virtually indistinguishable from those conferred by the previously identified nonnull mutations of RAD50 (rad50S). Most notably, both mutations confer only weak sensitivity to the radiomimetic agent methyl methane sulfonate (MMS) but completely block resection and turnover of meiosis-specific double-strand breaks. These observations provide further evidence that this constellation of phenotypes identifies a specific molecular function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sharp, P. M., & Li, W.-H. (1987) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/15.3.1281 · Cited by 3,992
The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations
Lea, D. E., & Coulson, C. A. (1949) · Journal of Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf02986080 · Cited by 1,450
Cited by
Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Pâques, F., & Haber, J. E. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.2.349-404.1999 · Cited by 2,120
Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection
Sartori, A. A., Lukas, C., Coates, J., Mistrik, M., Fu, S., Bartek, J., Baer, R., Lukas, J., & Jackson, S. P. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06337 · Cited by 1,362
A DNA Damage Response Pathway Controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 Complex
Usui, T., Ogawa, H., & Petrini, J. H. J. (2001) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00270-2 · Cited by 384
DNA Repair in Mammalian Cells: DNA double-strand break repair: how to fix a broken relationship
Pardo, B., Gómez-González, B., & Aguilera, A. (2009) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-009-8740-3 · Cited by 280
EXO1-A multi-tasking eukaryotic nuclease
Tran, P. T., Erdeniz, N., Symington, L. S., & Liskay, R. M. (2004) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.05.015 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- McKee, A. H. Z., & Kleckner, N.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-07-01
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 797-816
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1851483641
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A General Method for Identifying Recessive Diploid-Specific Mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Its Application to the Isolation of Mutants Blocked at Intermediate Stages of Meiotic Prophase and Characterization of a New Gene SAE2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/146.3.797
- The paper
- McKee, A. H. Z., & Kleckner, N. (1997). A General Method for Identifying Recessive Diploid-Specific Mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Its Application to the Isolation of Mutants Blocked at Intermediate Stages of Meiotic Prophase and Characterization of a New Gene SAE2. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/146.3.797
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.