The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stochastic Kinetic Analysis of Developmental Pathway Bifurcation in Phage λ-Infected Escherichia coli Cells
Abstract
Fluctuations in rates of gene expression can produce highly erratic time patterns of protein production in individual cells and wide diversity in instantaneous protein concentrations across cell populations. When two independently produced regulatory proteins acting at low cellular concentrations competitively control a switch point in a pathway, stochastic variations in their concentrations can produce probabilistic pathway selection, so that an initially homogeneous cell population partitions into distinct phenotypic subpopulations. Many pathogenic organisms, for example, use this mechanism to randomly switch surface features to evade host responses. This coupling between molecular-level fluctuations and macroscopic phenotype selection is analyzed using the phage λ lysis-lysogeny decision circuit as a model system. The fraction of infected cells selecting the lysogenic pathway at different phage:cell ratios, predicted using a molecular-level stochastic kinetic model of the genetic regulatory circuit, is consistent with experimental observations. The kinetic model of the decision circuit uses the stochastic formulation of chemical kinetics, stochastic mechanisms of gene expression, and a statistical-thermodynamic model of promoter regulation. Conventional deterministic kinetics cannot be used to predict statistics of regulatory systems that produce probabilistic outcomes. Rather, a stochastic kinetic analysis must be used to predict statistics of regulatory outcomes for such stochastically regulated systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transcriptional activation by recruitment
Ptashne, M., & Gann, A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/386569a0 · Cited by 1,158
Cited by
Nature, Nurture, or Chance: Stochastic Gene Expression and Its Consequences
Raj, A., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.050 · Cited by 2,593
Kitano, H. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1471 · Cited by 2,278
Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells
Raj, A., Peskin, C. S., Tranchina, D., Vargas, D. Y., & Tyagi, S. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040309 · Cited by 1,737
A N EW A PPROACH TO D ECODING L IFE : Systems Biology
Ideker, T., Galitski, T., & Hood, L. (2001) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.2.1.343 · Cited by 1,664
Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression
Swain, P. S., Elowitz, M. B., & Siggia, E. D. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.162041399 · Cited by 1,661
Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell
Tyson, J. J., Chen, K. C., & Novak, B. (2003) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/s0955-0674(03)00017-6 · Cited by 1,583
Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks
Thattai, M., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.151588598 · Cited by 1,428
Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression
Raser, J. M., & O'Shea, E. K. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1098641 · Cited by 1,425
Modelling and analysis of gene regulatory networks
Karlebach, G., & Shamir, R. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2503 · Cited by 1,296
Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise
Rao, C. V., Wolf, D. M., & Arkin, A. P. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01258 · Cited by 1,006
Self-citationMicrobial Cell Individuality and the Underlying Sources of Heterogeneity
Avery, S. V. (2006) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1460 · Cited by 521
Modular cell biology: retroactivity and insulation
Del Vecchio, D., Ninfa, A. J., & Sontag, E. D. (2008) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb4100204 · Cited by 519
A Stochastic Single-Molecule Event Triggers Phenotype Switching of a Bacterial Cell
Choi, P. J., Cai, L., Frieda, K., & Xie, X. S. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1161427 · Cited by 438
Motifs, modules and games in bacteria
Wolf, D. M., & Arkin, A. P. (2003) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5274(03)00033-x · Cited by 303
Self-citationGolightly, A., & Wilkinson, D. J. (2011) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2011.0047 · Cited by 282
The statistical mechanics of complex signaling networks: Nerve growth factor signaling.
Brown, K. S., Hill, C. C., Calero, G. A., Myers, C. R., Lee, K. H., Sethna, J. P., & Cerione, R. A. (2004) · Physical Biology · doi:10.1088/1478-3967/1/3/006 · Cited by 265
MicroRNAs acting in a double-negative feedback loop to control a neuronal cell fate decision
Johnston, R. J., Chang, S., Etchberger, J. F., Ortiz, C. O., & Hobert, O. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0505530102 · Cited by 276
Challenges in measuring and understanding biological noise
Eling, N., Morgan, M. D., & Marioni, J. C. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0130-6 · Cited by 247
Bayesian methods in bioinformatics and computational systems biology
Wilkinson, D. J. (2006) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbm007 · Cited by 230
Buhse, T., Cruz, J.-M., Noble-Terán, M. E., Hochberg, D., Ribó, J. M., Crusats, J., & Micheau, J.-C. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00819 · Cited by 189
McCollum, J. M., Peterson, G. D., Cox, C. D., Simpson, M. L., & Samatova, N. F. (2006) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2005.10.007 · Cited by 182
Zak, D. E., Gonye, G. E., Schwaber, J. S., & Doyle, F. J. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1198103 · Cited by 177
Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic simulation modelling
Grass, G. M., & Sinko, P. J. (2002) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00013-3 · Cited by 160
Predicting Gene Essentiality Using Genome-Scale in Silico Models
Joyce, A. R., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2008) · Methods in Molecular Biology™ · doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-321-9_30 · Cited by 87
Kinetic Modeling of Virus Growth in Cells
Yin, J., & Redovich, J. (2018) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00066-17 · Cited by 74
Doyle, F. J., & Stelling, J. (2006) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2006.0143 · Cited by 60
Globally optimised parameters for a model of mitotic control in frog egg extracts.
Zwolak, J. W., Tyson, J. J., & Watson, L. T. (2005) · IEE Proceedings - Systems Biology · doi:10.1049/ip-syb:20045032 · Cited by 49
Synthesis of biological models from mutation experiments
Koksal, A. S., Pu, Y., Srivastava, S., Bodik, R., Fisher, J., & Piterman, N. (2013) · Proceedings of the 40th annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages · doi:10.1145/2429069.2429125 · Cited by 36
Toward a quantitative understanding of the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway through simulation and experiment
Lloyd‐Lewis, B., Fletcher, A. G., Dale, T. C., & Byrne, H. M. (2013) · WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1002/wsbm.1221 · Cited by 31
Signaling pathways have an inherent need for noise to acquire information
Azpeitia, E., Balanzario, E. P., & Wagner, A. (2020) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-020-03778-x · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Arkin, A., Ross, J., & McAdams, H. H.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-08-01
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1633-1648
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1946177469
- Cited by
- 1,490
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
