Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functionally Relevant Thresholds of Quadriceps Femoris Strength

Ploutz-Snyder, L. L., Manini, T., Ploutz-Snyder, R. J., Wolf, D. A.·2002·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify quadriceps femoris strength thresholds below which performance on ambulatory tasks is compromised. A second purpose was to evaluate whether self-reported functioning matches evaluated performance of the activities. Subjects (N = 100; age 73 +/- 0.9 years) participated in isometric knee extension strength tests, performed three functional ambulatory tasks (chair rise, gait speed, and stair ascent and descent), and answered standard survey questions assessing physical function. Significant relationships were observed between functional performance and the ratio of isometric leg extension peak torque to body weight (STR/WT) for each activity (p <.0001). For each activity, thresholds of STR/WT between 3.0 and 3.5 N m/kg were observed, below which the likelihood for success was reduced. Thresholds were determined by calculating the value of STR/WT that minimized the classification error. Individuals with a STR/WT < 3.0 N m/kg are at a substantial risk for impaired function in chair rise, gait speed, and stair ascent and descent. Sensitivity and specificity of STR/WT as a predictor of functional success ranged from 76% to 81% and from 78% to 94%, respectively, depending on activity. This is of clinical significance, as the STR/WT thresholds can identify individuals with preclinical disability (beginning to have difficulty with ambulatory tasks) as opposed to those in whom an outright disability is observed. This may be useful for targeting individuals for strengthening interventions and developing specific intervention goals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/57.4.b144

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Ploutz-Snyder, L. L., Manini, T., Ploutz-Snyder, R. J., & Wolf, D. A.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2002-04-01
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
B144-B152
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2113730892
Cited by
300
References
30
FWCI
18.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functionally Relevant Thresholds of Quadriceps Femoris Strength. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/gerona/57.4.b144
The paper
Ploutz-Snyder, L. L., Manini, T., Ploutz-Snyder, R. J., & Wolf, D. A. (2002). Functionally Relevant Thresholds of Quadriceps Femoris Strength. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/57.4.b144

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.