Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 785

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cancer Survivors in the United States: Age, Health, and Disability

Hewitt, M., Rowland, J. H., Yancik, R.·2003·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Relatively little is known about the health and disability of adult cancer survivors. As a way to explore these issues, data from the National Health Interview Survey (years 1998-2000) were analyzed. METHODS: Comparisons were made between cancer survivors (n = 4878) and those without a history of cancer (n = 90,737), using both descriptive statistics and logistic-regression models on general health status, psychological disability, limitations in activities of daily living, physical function, and health-related ability to work. Among cancer survivors, health and disability status were assessed by cancer site or type, age at diagnosis, and years since cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Compared with individuals without a history of cancer or other chronic disease, cancer survivors without other chronic diseases were significantly more likely to report being in fair or poor health (odds ratio, or OR, 2.97), a psychological disability (OR 2.18), limitations of activities of daily living or instrumental activities of daily living (OR 2.22), functional limitations (OR 1.74), and, among those under the age of 65, being unable to work because of a health condition (OR 3.22). The likelihood of poor health and disability was much higher among cancer survivors who also reported comorbid chronic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Providers caring for cancer survivors should be made aware of the long-term health consequences of cancer and consider appropriate supportive care for their patients. The identification of long-term effects of cancer that contribute to disability and the interventions needed to ameliorate these and their consequences should become a more prominent aspect of the research agenda.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/58.1.m82

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 2002, 94, 2766, 10.1002/cncr.10593 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Yancik, 1997, Rays, 22, 3
  3. Ganz, 1998, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16, 501, 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.2.501 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Shimozuma, 1999, Breast cancer research and treatment, 56, 45, 10.1023/A:1006214830854 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Ganz, 2002, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 94, 39, 10.1093/jnci/94.1.39 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 2001, New England Journal of Medicine, 340, 383
  7. Paci, 1996, Tumori, 82, 321, 10.1177/030089169608200405 · DOI
  8. 2000, Oncology, 14, 75, 10.1159/000317625 · doi:10.1159/000317625
  9. Ahles, 2002, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20, 485, 10.1200/JCO.20.2.485 · doi:10.1200/jco.20.2.485 · Paper page
  10. Schag, 1994, Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 3, 127, 10.1007/BF00435256 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Potosky, 1999, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 91, 1719, 10.1093/jnci/91.20.1719 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 1998, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 90, 656, 10.1093/jnci/90.9.656 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Sliwa, 1999, Cancer treatment and research, 100, 75, 10.1007/978-1-4615-5003-7_5 · DOI
  14. 1998, REHAB MANAGE, 11, 80
  15. Penfold, 1996, Cancer treatment reviews, 22, 75, 10.1016/S0305-7372(96)90016-X · doi:10.1016/s0305-7372(96)90016-x
  16. Mellette, 1994, Seminars in oncology, 21, 779
  17. Ganz, 1993, Medical care, 31, 419, 10.1097/00005650-199305000-00004 · DOI
  18. Zabora, 2001, Psycho-oncology, 10, 19, 10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1<19::AID-PON501>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 1994, 74, 2118, 10.1002/1097-0142(19941001)74:7+<2118::AID-CNCR2820741720>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI · Paper page
  20. Desai, 2001, American Journal of Epidemiology, 153, 299, 10.1093/aje/153.3.299 · DOI
  21. Hewitt, 1999, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 91, 1480, 10.1093/jnci/91.17.1480 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Yancik, 2001, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19, 1147, 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.4.1147 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Yancik, 2001, JAMA, 285, 885, 10.1001/jama.285.7.885 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 2001, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 50, 120

Cited by

See all 785

Metadata

Authors
Hewitt, M., Rowland, J. H., & Yancik, R.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2003-01-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
M82-M91
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2112316780
Cited by
785
References
4
FWCI
6.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer Survivors in the United States: Age, Health, and Disability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/gerona/58.1.m82
The paper
Hewitt, M., Rowland, J. H., & Yancik, R. (2003). Cancer Survivors in the United States: Age, Health, and Disability. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/58.1.m82

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.