The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perspectives on Comorbidity and Cancer in Older Patients: Approaches to Expand the Knowledge Base
Abstract
Abstract : Not only do persons 65 years and older bear a disproportionate burden of cancer, advancing age is associated with increased vulnerability to other age-related health problems. Newly diagnosed older cancer patients who have lived into later years of life may have concurrent ailments (eg, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, arthritis, and/or hypertension) that could affect treatment choice, prognosis, and survival. The clinician must often make cancer treatment decisions in the context of an older individual’s pre-existing health problems (ie, comorbidity). Ways to produce reliable information on comorbidity that can be effectively used in evaluation of older cancer patients are urgently needed. What is the nature and severity of the older patient’s comorbid health problems? How do other age-related conditions influence treatment decisions and the cancer course? How do already compromised older patients tolerate the stress of cancer and its treatment? How are concomitant comorbid conditions managed? At present, no established, valid way to assess comorbidity in older cancer patients exists. Such technology, with a solid conceptual and scientific base, promises a high positive clinical yield to assure quality cancer care for older patients if reliable and valid instruments can be integrated into oncology practice. Much preliminary scientific work must be performed. A synthesis of viewpoints on what to include in comorbidity assessment of older cancer patients and development approaches were expressed in a multidisciplinary working group convened by the National Institute on Aging and the National Cancer Institute. We share the key issues raised regarding complexities of comorbidity assessment and suggestions for scientific inquiry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorror, M. L., Maris, M. B., Storb, R., Baron, F., Sandmaier, B. M., Maloney, D. G., & Storer, B. (2005) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2005-05-2004 · Cited by 2,969
Galvão, D. A., Taaffe, D. R., Spry, N., Joseph, D., Turner, D., & Newton, R. U. (2009) · Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases · doi:10.1038/pcan.2008.51 · Cited by 198
The role of estrogen deficiency in skin ageing and wound healing
Emmerson, E., & Hardman, M. J. (2012) · Biogerontology · doi:10.1007/s10522-011-9322-y · Cited by 118
Kim, Y., van Ryn, M., Jensen, R. E., Griffin, J. M., Potosky, A., & Rowland, J. (2015) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3580 · Cited by 99
“For example, age [20] and (co)morbidity [21,22] for both patients and caregivers, and stage of cancer for patients [23] affect QOL.”
BackgroundPrescribers’ attitudes toward elderly breast cancer patients. Discrimination or empathy?
Protière, C., Viens, P., Rousseau, F., & Moatti, J. P. (2010) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.09.007 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Yancik, R., Ganz, P. A., Varricchio, C. G., & Conley, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2001-02-15
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1147-1151
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1867879258
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perspectives on Comorbidity and Cancer in Older Patients: Approaches to Expand the Knowledge Base. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.4.1147
- The paper
- Yancik, R., Ganz, P. A., Varricchio, C. G., & Conley, B. (2001). Perspectives on Comorbidity and Cancer in Older Patients: Approaches to Expand the Knowledge Base. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.4.1147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.