Cited by 246Health disparities and outcomesIncome, Poverty, and InequalityPublic Health and Social Inequalities

Poverty and Biological Risk: The Earlier "Aging" of the Poor

Open access
Crimmins, E. M., Kim, J. K., Seeman, T. E.·2009·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We examined age differences in levels of biological risk factors in the U.S. population by poverty status. It is not clear how socioeconomic status differentials in biological risk change with age because of mortality. METHODS: We used two nationally representative samples (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES] III, 1988-1994, and NHANES, 1999-2004) with data for more than 12,000 people aged 20 and older in each data set to examine biological risk for persons in families with incomes below and close to poverty level and those with higher income. We examined how mortality and life expectancy in the earlier sample are related to poverty status and biological risk. We examined life table survivorship to clarify how mortality differentially removes those who are poor and those with high biological risk from the population. RESULTS: Differences in biological risk by poverty status are larger before old age and become insignificant at older ages. Life expectancy at age 20 differs markedly by biological risk and poverty status. CONCLUSIONS: Population differentials in health at older ages result from a lifetime of differences. Socioeconomic differences in health in old age disappear because of health and mortality differentials at earlier ages. Poorer people "age" earlier and this affects the age pattern of social differentials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/gln010

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analyses of nationally representative U.S. NHANES data for adults aged 20 and over documented SES gradients in allostatic load and faster age-specific accumulation associated with poverty.

    “Analyses of nationally representative U.S. data for adults aged 20 and over from the National Health & Nutrition Survey (NHANES) have also documented these same SES gradients in AL [188][189][190] and the faster age-specific accumulation associated with poverty.191”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [7]7. Crimmins E . Socioeconomic differentials in mortality and health at the older ages . Genus . 2005 ; 61 : 163 - 176 .
  2. [11]11. Hummer RA , Benjamins MR , Rogers RG . Race/ethnic disparities in health and mortality among the elderly: a documentation and examination of social factors . In: Anderson N , Bulato R , Cohen B , eds. Critical Perspectives on Racial and Ethnic Differences in Health in Late Life . Washington, DC .: The National Academies Press ; 2004 : 53 - 94 .
  3. [12]12. Liao Y , Cooper RS , Cao G , et al . Mortality patterns among older Hispanics: fi ndings from the National Health Interview Survey (1986 to 1994) . J Am Coll Cardiol . 1998 ; 30 : 1200 - 1205 .
  4. [22]22. Crimmins EM , Seeman TE . Integrating biology into the study of health disparities . Popul Dev Rev . 2004 ; 30 : 89 - 107 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crimmins, E. M., Kim, J. K., & Seeman, T. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2009-02-01
Volume
64A
Issue
2
Pages
286-292
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2085176599
Cited by
246
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI
14.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (P30 AG17265, R01AG023347, P30AG017265)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
poverty, biological risk factors, socioeconomic status, aging, mortality, life expectancy, life tables, NHANES
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aging, Cause of Death, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Income, Life Expectancy, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Nutritional Status, Poverty, Predictive Value of Tests, Reference Values, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Proportional Hazards Models, Odds Ratio, Risk Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review