Cited by 156Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementHealth disparities and outcomesRetirement, Disability, and Employment

The Significance of Education for Mortality Compression in the United States

Open access
Brown, Dustin C., Hayward, Mark D., Montez, Jennifer Karas, Hummer, Robert A., Chiu, Chi-Tsun, Hidajat, Mira M.·2012·Demography

Abstract

Recent studies of old-age mortality trends assess whether longevity improvements over time are linked to increasing compression of mortality at advanced ages. The historical backdrop of these studies is the long-term improvement in a population's socioeconomic resources that fueled longevity gains. We extend this line of inquiry by examining whether socioeconomic differences in longevity within a population are accompanied by old-age mortality compression. Specifically, we document educational differences in longevity and mortality compression for older men and women in the United States. Drawing on the fundamental cause of disease framework, we hypothesize that both longevity and compression increase with higher levels of education and that women with the highest levels of education will exhibit the greatest degree of longevity and compression. Results based on the Health and Retirement Study and the National Health Interview Survey Linked Mortality File confirm a strong educational gradient in both longevity and mortality compression. We also find that mortality is more compressed within educational groups among women than men. The results suggest that educational attainment in the United States maximizes life chances by delaying the biological aging process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13524-012-0104-1

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Whenever compression of morbidity was found, there seems to be a strong influence of socioeconomic status, favoring individuals with a higher status.

    “Whenever compression of morbidity was found, there seems to be a strong influence of socioeconomic status, favoring individuals with a higher status (e.g., Brown et al., 2012; House, Lantz, & Herd, 2005).”

    From Toward a More Comprehensive Concept of Successful Aging: Disability and Care Needs: Table 1. (2016) · cites this paper as Brown et al., 2012

    The Conclusion reports that mortality is more compressed among highly educated people, and the Educational Differences in Longevity and Compression section links greater mortality compression to socioeconomic advantage. The claim instead concerns compression of morbidity, which these passages do not establish; the paper’s reported compression outcome is mortality. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Van Raalte AA Kunst A Mackenbach JP 2009 How Much Does Socioeconomic Inequality Contribute to Total Lifespan Inequality? Paper Presentation at the IUSSP 26th Annual International Population Conference Marrakech, Morocco September 27th-October 2nd

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, D. C., Hayward, M. D., Montez, J. K., Hummer, R. A., Chiu, C.-T., & Hidajat, M. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Dustin C.
Venue
Demography
Published
2012-05-04
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
819-840
ISSN
  • 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-7790
OpenAlex
W2150844713
Cited by
156
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 4
FWCI
36.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Demography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Texas at Austin (R24HD042849, 5 R24 HD042849, 5 T32 HD007081)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD042849, 1 R01-HD053696)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD042849, 1 R01, R01HD053696, T32HD007081)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Keywords
longevity, educational attainment, fundamental cause theory, sex differences, older adults, life chances, biological aging, mortality trends
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Life Expectancy, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Sex Distribution, Health Status Disparities, Mortality, Premature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review