Cited by 2,525Health disparities and outcomesRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchGender, Health, and Social Inequality

“Weathering” and Age Patterns of Allostatic Load Scores Among Blacks and Whites in the United States

Open access
Geronimus, Arline T., Hicken, Margaret, Keene, Danya, Bound, John·2006·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We considered whether US Blacks experience early health deterioration, as measured across biological indicators of repeated exposure and adaptation to stressors. Methods. Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, we examined allostatic load scores for adults aged 18–64 years. We estimated probability of a high score by age, race, gender, and poverty status and Blacks’ odds of having a high score relative to Whites’ odds. Results. Blacks had higher scores than did Whites and had a greater probability of a high score at all ages, particularly at 35–64 years. Racial differences were not explained by poverty. Poor and nonpoor Black women had the highest and second highest probability of high allostatic load scores, respectively, and the highest excess scores compared with their male or White counterparts. Conclusions. We found evidence that racial inequalities in health exist across a range of biological systems among adults and are not explained by racial differences in poverty. The weathering effects of living in a race-conscious society may be greatest among those Blacks most likely to engage in high-effort coping.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2004.060749

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geronimus, A. T., Hicken, M., Keene, D., & Bound, J.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2006-05
Volume
96
Issue
5
Pages
826-833
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W1999745316
Cited by
2,525
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 195 · 2025: 243 · 2024: 197 · 2023: 231 · 2022: 254 · 2021: 213 · 2020: 179 · 2019: 143 · 2018: 110 · 2017: 145 · 2016: 88 · 2015: 89 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 70
FWCI
15.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Michigan
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (5 T32 AG00221, T32AG000221)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (5T32 HD 07339, T32HD007339)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
weathering, allostatic load, racial disparities in health, black-white disparities, chronic stress, poverty, gender differences, age differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aging, Black or African American, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Poverty, Probability, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, United States, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review