Cited by 28Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceScience, Research, and Medicine

Barriers to the Preclinical Development of Therapeutics that Target Aging Mechanisms: Table 1.

Open access
Burd, Christin E., Gill, Matthew S., Niedernhofer, Laura J., Robbins, Paul D., Austad, Steven N., Barzilai, Nir, Kirkland, James L.·2016·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

Through the progress of basic science research, fundamental mechanisms that contribute to age-related decline are being described with increasing depth and detail. Although these efforts have identified new drug targets and compounds that extend life span in model organisms, clinical trials of therapeutics that target aging processes remain scarce. Progress in aging research is hindered by barriers associated with the translation of basic science discoveries into the clinic. This report summarizes discussions held at a 2014 Geroscience Network retreat focused on identifying hurdles that currently impede the preclinical development of drugs targeting fundamental aging processes. From these discussions, it was evident that aging researchers have varied perceptions of the ideal preclinical pipeline. To forge a clear and cohesive path forward, several areas of controversy must first be resolved and new tools developed. Here, we focus on five key issues in preclinical drug development (drug discovery, lead compound development, translational preclinical biomarkers, funding, and integration between researchers and clinicians), expanding upon discussions held at the Geroscience Retreat and suggesting areas for further research. By bringing these findings to the attention of the aging research community, we hope to lay the foundation for a concerted preclinical drug development pipeline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/glw112

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Limitations of current clinical trials include small recruitment sizes, few measurable clinically-relevant outcomes appropriate for older adults, and need for biomarkers tracking pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and mechanistic properties and serving as surrogate endpoints.

    “Limitations of current clinical trials include small recruitment sizes, the paucity of measurable, clinically-relevant outcomes appropriate for older adults, as well as the need for biomarkers that follow pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and mechanistic properties of study drugs and could serve as surrogate endpoints [92–94].”

    From Reducing Senescent Cell Burden in Aging and Disease (2020) · cites this paper as [92]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]Freemantle N Calvert M Wood J Eastaugh J Griffin C Composite outcomes in randomized trials: greater precision but with greater uncertainty? JAMA. 2003; 289: 2554– 2559. doi:10.1001/jama.289.19.2554 12759327 · DOI
  2. [12]Bogue MA Peters LL Paigen B Accessing data resources in the mouse phenome database for genetic analysis of murine life span and health span. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016; 71: 170– 177. doi:10.1093/gerona/glu223 25533306 PMC4707687 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burd, C. E., Gill, M. S., Niedernhofer, L. J., Robbins, P. D., Austad, S. N., Barzilai, N., & Kirkland, J. L.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
  • Burd, Christin E.
  • Gill, Matthew S.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2016-08-16
Volume
71
Issue
11
Pages
1388-1394
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2510623374
Cited by
28
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R24 AG044396)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Science, Research, and Medicine
Keywords
anti-aging therapeutics, preclinical drug development, drug discovery, lead compound development, preclinical biomarkers, research funding, clinician-researcher collaboration, geroscience
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Clinical Trials as Topic, Congresses as Topic, Disease Models, Animal, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Geriatrics, Humans, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review