Cited by 173Resilience and Mental HealthGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsFrailty in Older Adults

Report: NIA Workshop on Measures of Physiologic Resiliencies in Human Aging

Open access
Hadley, Evan C, Kuchel, George A, Newman, Anne B, Allore, Heather G, Bartley, Jenna M, Bergeman, Cindy S, Blinov, Michael L, Colon-Emeric, Cathleen S +17 more·2017·The Journals of Gerontology: Series A

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Resilience, the ability to resist or recover from adverse effects of a stressor, is of widespread interest in social, psychologic, biologic, and medical research and particularly salient as the capacity to respond to stressors becomes diminished with aging. To date, research on human resilience responses to and factors influencing these responses has been limited. METHODS: The National Institute on Aging convened a workshop in August 2015 on needs for research to improve measures to predict and assess resilience in human aging. Effects of aging-related factors in impairing homeostatic responses were developed from examples illustrating multiple determinants of clinical resilience outcomes. Research directions were identified by workshop participants. RESULTS: Research needs identified included expanded uses of clinical data and specimens in predicting or assessing resilience, and contributions from epidemiological studies in identifying long-term predictors. Better measures, including simulation tests, are needed to assess resilience and its determinants. Mechanistic studies should include exploration of influences of biologic aging processes on human resiliencies. Important resource and infrastructure needs include consensus phenotype definitions of specific resiliencies, capacity to link epidemiological and clinical resilience data, sensor technology to capture responses to stressors, better laboratory animal models of human resiliencies, and new analytic methods to understand the effects of multiple determinants of stress responses. CONCLUSIONS: Extending the focus of care and research to improving the capacity to respond to stressors could benefit older adults in promoting a healthier life span.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/glx015

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interlinked fundamental aging processes appear to act as root causes of many disorders and diseases.

    “Interlinked and fundamental aging processes appear to be a root-cause contributor to many disorders and diseases.”

    From Cellular senescence and senolytics: the path to the clinic (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    The “Mechanistic Studies” section says basic aging mechanisms may act individually or collectively and influence a wide variety of aging-related outcomes. The “Influence of Biologic Aging Mechanisms on Resilience” section says they could contribute to declining clinical and physiologic resilience. Neither section establishes that these processes are root-cause contributors to many disorders and diseases; the paper frames their influence as a subject for further research. The supplied passages give no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Geroscience Hypothesis holds that the pillars of aging, including cellular senescence, tend to progress together and may be root-cause contributors to multiple diseases, age-related dysfunction, and loss of resilience.

    “The Geroscience Hypothesis holds that these pillars of aging, including cellular senescence, tend to progress in concert and may be root-cause contributors to the pathophysiology of multiple diseases”

    From Cellular senescence and senolytics: the path to the clinic (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    The “Influence of Biologic Aging Mechanisms on Resilience” section identifies cellular senescence as a mechanism that could affect several types of resilience, and “Mechanistic Studies” says aging mechanisms may influence a wide variety of outcomes. Our copy does not say that the pillars of aging progress in concert or establish them as root-cause contributors to multiple diseases. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kuchel, 2017, Aging and homeostatic regulation, 1871

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hadley, E. C., Kuchel, G. A., Newman, A. B., Allore, H. G., Bartley, J. M., Bergeman, C. S., Blinov, M. L., Colon-Emeric, C. S., Dabhar, F. S., Dugan, L. L., Dutta, C., Eldadah, B. A., Ferrucci, L., Kirkland, J. L., Kritchevsky, S. B., Lipsitz, L. A., Nadkarni, N. K., Reed, M. J., Schmader, K. E., Sierra, F., Studenski, S. A., Varadhan, R., Walston, J. D., Whitson, H. E., & Yung, R.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • UConn Health (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Newman, Anne B
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
Published
2017-05-05
Volume
72
Issue
7
Pages
980-990
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2611341457
Cited by
173
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3
FWCI
15.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Michigan Library
Funders
National Institute on Aging
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
resilience, human aging, stress response, homeostatic responses, older adults, biological aging, sensor technology
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aging, Consensus Statements as Topic, Female, Humans, Male, Stress, Psychological, Geriatric Assessment, Behavioral Research, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review