CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 745Frailty in Older AdultsAging, Health, and DisabilityAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for the Domains Supporting the Construct of Intrinsic Capacity

Cesari, Matteo, Araujo de Carvalho, Islene, Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan, Jotheeswaran, Cooper, Cyrus, Martin, Finbarr C, Reginster, Jean-Yves, Vellas, Bruno, Beard, John R·2018·The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
DOI 10.1093/gerona/gly011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Healthy ageing can be defined as "the process of developing and maintaining the functional ability that enables wellbeing in older age". Functional ability (i.e., the health-related attributes that enable people to be and to do what they have reason to value) is determined by intrinsic capacity (i.e., the composite of all the physical and mental capacities of an individual), the environment (i.e., all the factors in the extrinsic world that form the context of an individual's life), and the interactions between the two. This innovative model recently proposed by the World Health Organization has the potential to substantially modify the way in which clinical practice is currently conducted, shifting from disease-centered toward function-centered paradigms. By overcoming the multiple limitations affecting the construct of disease, this novel framework may allow the worldwide dissemination of a more proactive and function-based approach toward achieving optimal health status. In order to facilitate the translation of the current theoretical model into practice, it is important to identify the inner nature of its constituting constructs. In this article, we consider intrinsic capacity. Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework as background and taking into account available evidence, five domains (i.e., locomotion, vitality, cognition, psychological, sensory) are identified as pivotal for capturing the individual's intrinsic capacity (and therefore also reserves) and, through this, pave the way for its objective measurement.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/gly011

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 81 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–744 of 744

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Cesari, M., Araujo de Carvalho, I., Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan, J., Cooper, C., Martin, F. C., Reginster, J.-Y., Vellas, B., & Beard, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
  • Department of Ageing and Life Course, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
  • MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Liège (BE)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Cesari, Matteo
ORCID
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2018-02-02
Volume
73
Issue
12
Pages
1653-1660
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
DOI
10.1093/gerona/gly011
OpenAlex
W2791724957
Cited by
745
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 148 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 11
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0508-10082, NF-SI-0513-10085)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12011/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
intrinsic capacity, healthy aging, functional capacity, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, locomotion, vitality, cognition, psychological capacity, sensory function, older adults
MeSH terms
Frailty, Healthy Aging, Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Disability Evaluation, Female, Health Services for the Aged, Humans, Male, Models, Biological, Risk Factors, United States, Geriatric Assessment, Needs Assessment, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review