Cited by 293Memory Processes and InfluencesAging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Functions and Memory

Optimal Time of Day and the Magnitude of Age Differences in Memory

May, Cynthia P., Hasher, Lynn, Stoltzfus, Ellen R.·1993·Psychological Science

Abstract

Across two studies comparing younger and older adults, age differences in optimal performance periods were identified (Study 1), and then shown to be an important determinant of memory differences (Study 2). A norming study showed that while most younger adults were Evening or Neutral types, as determined by a standard questionnaire, the vast majority of older adults were Morning types. A second study compared the recognition performance of younger and older adults tested in the morning or in the late afternoon. Substantial age differences were found in the late afternoon, when younger but not older adults were at their optimal times. However, no age differences in memory performance were found in the morning, when older but not younger adults were at their peak period. Thus, synchrony between optimal performance periods and the time at which testing is conducted may well be a critical variable in determining group differences in intellectual performance, particularly between older and younger adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00573.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
May, C. P., Hasher, L., & Stoltzfus, E. R.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
1993-09
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
326-330
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2151618864
Cited by
293
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
circadian rhythm, chronotype, age differences, memory, recognition memory, older adults, young adults, testing time, cognitive performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review