Cited by 261Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyHealth disparities and outcomesAging and Gerontology Research

Exploring the Stress-Buffering Effects of Church-Based and Secular Social Support on Self-Rated Health in Late Life

Krause, N.·2006·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to see if emotional support received from fellow church members and emotional support from secular social networks reduce the effects of financial strain on self-rated health. A second goal is to determine if church-based social support is a more important coping resource for older Blacks than for older Whites. METHODS: The data come from the second wave of interviews with a nationwide sample of older people. Two groups of older adults are included in the analyses: Older Christians who go to church more than twice a year (N=548) and older people who do not go to church as frequently (N=238). RESULTS: The data suggest that support from fellow church members tends to reduce the impact of financial strain on self-rated health, but support from secular network members fails to exert a similar effect. The findings also reveal that the stress-buffering effects of church-based support emerge among older Blacks, but not older Whites. DISCUSSION: The findings from this study suggest that there may be something relatively unique about support that is provided by fellow church members.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/61.1.s35

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-rated health is strongly related to objective health, that is, future health, health services use, and mortality.

    “While based on participants' subjective impression, self-rated health is strongly related to objective health, that is, future health, health services use, and mortality [505–507].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krause, N.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Krause, N.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2006-01-01
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
S35-S43
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2148102216
Cited by
261
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
10.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG014749)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
self-rated health, financial stress, stress buffering, older adults, racial differences, Black older adults, White older adults, religious coping, emotional support, church attendance
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion and Medicine, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Secularism, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review