Cited by 142Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcarePersonality Traits and PsychologyDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Personality and Health Care Decision-Making Style

Open access
Flynn, Kathryn E., Smith, Maureen A.·2007·The Journals of Gerontology: Series B

Abstract

Using the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study Graduate Survey (N = 5,830), a population-based cohort of older adults (most aged 63–66 years), we explored relationships between five factors of personality and four preference types that account for multiple components of the health care decision-making process (information exchange, deliberation, and selection of treatment choice). After adjustment for personal, health, social, and economic factors, we found that increased conscientiousness and openness to experience and decreased agreeableness and neuroticism corresponded to preferring the most active decision-making style compared with the least active. A better understanding of how personality traits relate to patient decision-making styles may help clinicians tailor treatment discussions to the needs and preferences of individual patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/62.5.p261

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A fivefactor perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flynn, K. E., & Smith, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Flynn, Kathryn E.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B
Published
2007-09-01
Volume
62
Issue
5
Pages
P261-P267
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2107989841
Cited by
142
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5p01ag021079-08)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R36 HS015544)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG9775, P01-AG021079, R01AG009775, AG21079)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
personality traits, healthcare decision-making, older adults, conscientiousness, openness to experience, agreeableness, neuroticism, patient preferences, treatment selection, information sharing, deliberation, patient-clinician communication
MeSH terms
Aged, Decision Making, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Patient Participation, Personality, Professional-Patient Relations, Socioeconomic Factors, Wisconsin, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review