The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Elder Mistreatment in the United States: Prevalence Estimates From a Nationally Representative Study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: The National Social Life, Health and Aging Project is the first population-based, nationally representative study to ask older adults about their recent experience of mistreatment. This article provides estimates of mistreatment by family members and examines the association of mistreatment with demographic and health characteristics. METHODS: We selected community-residing participants aged 57 to 85 using a multistage area probability design. Of those eligible, 3,005 participated in the study, for a weighted response rate of 75.5%. We asked respondents if in the past year they had experienced mistreatment in the following domains: verbal, financial, and physical. We asked those who reported mistreatment about their relationship to the person responsible. RESULTS: In all, 9% of older adults reported verbal mistreatment, 3.5% financial mistreatment, and 0.2% physical mistreatment by a family member. Odds of verbal mistreatment were higher for women and those with physical vulnerabilities and were lower for Latinos than for Whites. Odds of financial mistreatment were higher for African Americans and lower for Latinos than for Whites and were lower for those with a spouse or romantic partner than for those without partners. DISCUSSION: Few older adults report mistreatment by family members, with older adults quite insulated from physical mistreatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Elder Abuse: Global Situation, Risk Factors, and Prevention Strategies
Pillemer, K., Burnes, D., Riffin, C., & Lachs, M. S. (2016) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnw004 · Cited by 797
Family Caregiving for Older Adults
Schulz, R., Beach, S. R., Czaja, S. J., Martire, L. M., & Monin, J. K. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050754 · Cited by 754
Beach, S. R., Schulz, R., Castle, N. G., & Rosen, J. (2010) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnq053 · Cited by 640
Elder Abuse: Systematic Review and Implications for Practice
Dong, X. Q. (2015) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.13454 · Cited by 477
Elder abuse: a systematic review of risk factors in community-dwelling elders
Johannesen, M., & LoGiudice, D. (2013) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afs195 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Laumann, E. O., Leitsch, S. A., & Waite, L. J.
- Venue
- The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-07-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- S248-S254
- ISSN
- 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5368
- OpenAlex
- W2122416934
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elder Mistreatment in the United States: Prevalence Estimates From a Nationally Representative Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geronb/63.4.s248
- The paper
- Laumann, E. O., Leitsch, S. A., & Waite, L. J. (2008). Elder Mistreatment in the United States: Prevalence Estimates From a Nationally Representative Study. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/63.4.s248
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.