The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Financial Exploitation and Psychological Mistreatment Among Older Adults: Differences Between African Americans and Non-African Americans in a Population-Based Survey
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: to examine racial differences in (a) the prevalence of financial exploitation and psychological mistreatment since turning 60 and in the past 6 months and (b) the experience-perpetrator, frequency, and degree of upset-of psychological mistreatment in the past 6 months. DESIGN AND METHODS: random digit dial telephone recruitment and population-based survey (telephone and in-person) of 903 adults aged 60 years and older in Allegheny County (Pittsburgh), Pennsylvania (693 non-African American and 210 African American). Covariates included sex, age, education, marital status, household composition, cognitive function, instrumental activities of daily living/activities of daily living difficulties, and depression symptoms. RESULTS: prevalence rates were significantly higher for African Americans than for non-African Americans for financial exploitation since turning 60 (23.0% vs. 8.4%) and in the past 6 months (12.9% vs. 2.4%) and for psychological mistreatment since turning 60 (24.4% vs. 13.2%) and in the past 6 months (16.1% vs. 7.2%). These differences remained once all covariates were controlled in logistic regression models. There were also racial differences in the experience of psychological mistreatment in the past 6 months. Risk for clinical depression was also a consistent predictor of financial exploitation and psychological mistreatment. IMPLICATIONS: although the results will need to be replicated in national surveys, the study suggests that racial differences in elder mistreatment are a potentially serious issue deserving of continued attention from researchers, health providers, and social service professionals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
Measuring Intrafamily Conflict and Violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales
Straus, M. A. (1979) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/351733 · Cited by 6,187
Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory
Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005 · Cited by 1,910 · cited 1×
“These findings may also reflect an age-related positivity bias consistent with Socioemotional Selectivity Theory (Mather & Carstensen, 2005).”
BackgroundAcierno, R., Hernandez, M. A., Amstadter, A. B., Resnick, H. S., Steve, K., Muzzy, W., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (2010) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.163089 · Cited by 1,353
The Prevalence of Elder Abuse: A Random Sample Survey
Pillemer, K., & Finkelhor, D. (1988) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/28.1.51 · Cited by 918
Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation in an Aging America
Bonnie, R. J., & Wallace, R. B. (2013) · Cited by 740
Elder Mistreatment in the United States: Prevalence Estimates From a Nationally Representative Study
Laumann, E. O., Leitsch, S. A., & Waite, L. J. (2008) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/63.4.s248 · Cited by 459
Risk Factors for Reported Elder Abuse and Neglect: A Nine-Year Observational Cohort Study
Lachs, M. S., Williams, C., O'Brien, S., Hurst, L., & Horwitz, R. (1997) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/37.4.469 · Cited by 411
Measures of Cognitive Functioning in the AHEAD Study
Herzog, A. R., & Wallace, R. B. (1997) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/52b.special_issue.37 · Cited by 404
National Survey on Abuse of the Elderly in Canada
Podnieks, E. (1992) · Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1300/j084v04n01_02 · Cited by 323
Cited by
Elder Abuse: Global Situation, Risk Factors, and Prevention Strategies
Pillemer, K., Burnes, D., Riffin, C., & Lachs, M. S. (2016) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnw004 · Cited by 797
Elder Abuse: Systematic Review and Implications for Practice
Dong, X. Q. (2015) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.13454 · Cited by 477
Elder abuse: a systematic review of risk factors in community-dwelling elders
Johannesen, M., & LoGiudice, D. (2013) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afs195 · Cited by 391
Is psychological vulnerability related to the experience of fraud in older adults?
Lichtenberg, P. A., Stickney, L., & Paulson, D. (2013) · Clinical Gerontologist · doi:10.1080/07317115.2012.749323 · Cited by 146
Lichtenberg, P. A., Sugarman, M. A., Paulson, D., Ficker, L. J., & Rahman-Filipiak, A. (2016) · Clinical Gerontologist · doi:10.1080/07317115.2015.1101632 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Beach, S. R., Schulz, R., Castle, N. G., & Rosen, J.
- Venue
- The Gerontologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-07-22
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 744-757
- ISSN
- 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5341
- OpenAlex
- W2171797890
- Cited by
- 640
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 67.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Financial Exploitation and Psychological Mistreatment Among Older Adults: Differences Between African Americans and Non-African Americans in a Population-Based Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geront/gnq053
- The paper
- Beach, S. R., Schulz, R., Castle, N. G., & Rosen, J. (2010). Financial Exploitation and Psychological Mistreatment Among Older Adults: Differences Between African Americans and Non-African Americans in a Population-Based Survey. The Gerontologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.