Cited by 18Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging and Gerontology ResearchCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

The effect of diabetes on the cognitive trajectory of older adults in Mexico and the United States

Open access
Avila, Jaqueline C, Mejia-Arangom, Silvia, Jupiter, Daniel, Downer, Brian, Wong, Rebeca·2021·The Journals of Gerontology Series B

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the impact of diabetes on the long-term cognitive trajectories of older adults in 2 countries with different socioeconomic and health settings, and to determine whether this relationship differs by cognitive domains. This study uses Mexico and the United States to confirm if patterns hold in both populations, as these countries have similar diabetes prevalence but different socioeconomic conditions and diabetes-related mortality. METHODS: Two nationally representative cohorts of adults aged 50 years or older are used: the Mexican Health and Aging Study for Mexico and the Health and Retirement Study for the United States, with sample sizes of 18,810 and 26,244 individuals, respectively, followed up for a period of 14 years. The outcome is cognition measured as a total composite score and by domain (memory and nonmemory). Mixed-effect linear models are used to test the effect of diabetes on cognition at 65 years old and over time in each country. RESULTS: Diabetes is associated with lower cognition and nonmemory scores at baseline and over time in both countries. In Mexico, diabetes only predicts lower memory scores over time, whereas in the United States it only predicts lower memory scores at baseline. Women have higher total cognition and memory scores than men in both studies. The magnitude of the effect of diabetes on cognition is similar in both countries. DISCUSSION: Despite the overall lower cognition in Mexico and different socioeconomic characteristics, the impact of diabetes on cognitive decline and the main risk and protective factors for poor cognition are similar in both countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/gbaa094

Cites

26 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata (Vol. I: Continuous Responses) . STATA Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Avila, J. C., Mejia-Arangom, S., Jupiter, D., Downer, B., & Wong, R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
  • Departamento de Estudios de Población, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, Tijuana, Mexico
Corresponding author
Avila, Jaqueline C
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B
Published
2020-07-17
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
e153-e164
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W3043238043
Cited by
18
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG018016)
  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía
  • Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research (P30AG059301, K01AG058789)
  • University of Texas Medical Branch
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, cognitive decline, older adults, memory, cognitive trajectories, sex differences, cross-national comparison, Mexico, United States, socioeconomic conditions, Mexican Health and Aging Study, Health and Retirement Study
MeSH terms
Cognitive Aging, Memory and Learning Tests, Cognition, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mexico, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Prevalence, Cognitive Dysfunction, Protective Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review