Cited by 18Sleep and related disordersNursing care and researchDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Characteristics and Predictors of Sleep Among Spousal Care Dyads Living With Chronic Conditions

Open access
Liu, Yin, Song, Yeonsu, Johnson, Florence U, Lei, Lianlian, Choi, Seung-won Emily, Antonucci, Toni C, Robinson-Lane, Sheria G·2023·The Journals of Gerontology: Series B

Abstract

Objectives: Poor sleep is common among older adults with chronic health conditions and their spousal caregivers. However, dyadic sleep patterns among spouses are underexplored within the literature. This study examines dyadic sleep characteristics and associated contextual factors among spousal care dyads. Methods: Participants included 462 older adult spousal care dyads from the 2015 National Health and Aging Trends Study and National Study of Caregiving (mean ages of care recipients/caregivers = 79 and 76 years, respectively; 22% of dyads were living with dementia). Self-reported sleep included frequency of (a) trouble falling back asleep among dyads, (b) care-related sleep disturbances among caregivers, and (c) trouble initiating sleep among care recipients. Predictors included between-dyad characteristics such as whether respondents had dementia, care burden and support, relationship quality, neighborhood cohesion, and within-dyad characteristics such as demographics, depression, and positive affect. We conducted multilevel dyadic analysis and actor–partner interdependence modeling. Results: Sleep was correlated more among dyads living with dementia than those with other chronic conditions. Care dyads had poorer sleep if caregivers reported higher care burden; however, better relationship quality marginally ameliorated the association. Depressive symptoms had a partner effect on poorer sleep among care dyads, whereas positive emotions and older age only had an actor effect on better sleep for care recipients and spousal caregivers. Neighborhood cohesion, care support, and other demographic characteristics were not associated with dyadic sleep outcomes. Discussion: Addressing both care recipient- and caregiver-related factors may improve sleep health for both members of the care dyad living with chronic conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/gbac096

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The distress associated with caring for a relative with Alzheimer's or another dementia has been shown to negatively influence the quality of family caregivers' sleep.

    “The distress associated with caring for a relative with Alzheimer's or another dementia has also been shown to negatively influence the quality of family caregivers’ sleep. 553 , 554 , 555 , 556”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [555]

    The Results (Main-Effect Associations With Dyadic Sleep, p. 7) associate higher caregiver-reported burden with poorer sleep in both caregivers and care recipients. But the study examined spousal dyads living with dementia or other chronic conditions, and it reports an association rather than showing that dementia-care distress causes poorer sleep across family caregivers generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Song, Y., Johnson, F. U., Lei, L., Choi, S.-W. E., Antonucci, T. C., & Robinson-Lane, S. G.
Affiliations
  • Utah State University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • Department of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, School of Nursing, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan , USA
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B
Published
2022-09-16
Volume
78
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
S38-S47
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W4296023812
Cited by
18
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (U01AG032947, R01AG054004)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Michigan Center for Contextual Factors in Alzheimer’s Diesease (P30AG059300, K01AG065420, K23AG055668)
  • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
spousal caregivers, older adults, chronic disease, dementia, caregiver burden, relationship quality, depressive symptoms, positive affect, sleep disorders, neighborhood cohesion, care support, actor-partner interdependence
MeSH terms
Aged, Chronic Disease, Dementia, Humans, Quality of Life, Sleep, Caregivers, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review