Cited by 58Women's cancer prevention and managementGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Impact of age, redundancy, and perceptual noise on visual search

Allen, P. A., Madden, D. J., Groth, K. E., Crozier, L. C.·1992·Journal of Gerontology

Abstract

Literature related to the efficacy and to the definition and measurement of breast self-examination (BSE) is reviewed with particular attention to its relevance for women over 65. Overall, data on the efficacy of BSE suggest that it has a small but measurable impact on earlier detection of breast cancer as measured by clinical stage and tumor size and sometimes by pathological stage. The largest differences are between some BSE and no BSE. An analysis of BSE suggests that instructions could be simplified for older women in order to increase the reliability and acceptability of the examination. A research agenda is proposed which includes (a) testing BSE instructions tailored for older women, (b) studying the intervening steps between BSE and cancer diagnosis, (c) testing methods to increase acceptance by older women, and (d) investigating the relationship between BSE and earlier detection of breast cancer in older women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronj/47.2.p69

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The decline of working memory in aging includes a reduced ability to inhibit irrelevant or distracting information, which likely prevents older people from properly processing task-relevant information.

    “A third decline concerns the ability to inhibit irrelevant or distracting information (Allen, Madden, Groth, & Crozier, 1992;Hasher & Zacks, 1988), which is likely to withhold older people from the proper processing of information that is relevant for the task at hand.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allen, P. A., Madden, D. J., Groth, K. E., & Crozier, L. C.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland State University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Gerontology
Published
1992-03-01
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
P69-P74
ISSN
0022-1422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2321158109
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG-09282, AG-02163)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
breast self-examination, breast cancer detection, older women, early cancer detection, visual search, perceptual noise, redundancy, age effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Breast Self-Examination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review