Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dietary Restriction of Adult Male Rhesus Monkeys: Design, Methodology, and Preliminary Findings From the First Year of Study

Kemnitz, J. W., Weindruch, R., Roecker, E. B., Crawford, K., Kaufman, P. L., Ershler, W. B.·1993·Journal of Gerontology

Abstract

Dietary restriction (DR) retards aging processes and extends maximum life span in rodents and in simpler animals. We initiated a study in 30 adults (8-14 years old) male rhesus monkeys to determine whether or not aging processes are retarded by adult-onset DR in a primate species and herein report results from the experiment's first year. Following a 3-6 month period when baseline data were obtained, 15 animals were assigned to a control group and given free access to a semipurified diet for 6-8 hours per day. The other 15 monkeys were fed the same diet but at 70% of their baseline intake levels predetermined individually. The animals are being evaluated semi-annually for body size and composition, physical activity, metabolic rate, glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity, hematologic indices, immunologic function, and fingernail growth. Ocular function is assessed annually. The preliminary observations after one year are: (a) all monkeys appear to be in excellent health; (b) average body weights for controls increased by 9% while monkeys on DR did not gain weight; (c) monkeys on DR have less body fat than do control monkeys, whereas the amount of lean body mass has not been significantly influenced by DR; (d) there was a small but statistically significant reduction in physical activity for monkeys on DR relative to controls; and (e) DR has not overtly influenced the other measures. Control monkeys gradually reduced their voluntary levels of food intake during the first year of study, and food allotments to DR monkeys are being adjusted accordingly in order to reinstate the intended 30% difference between groups. These early data indicate that DR can be safely instituted in adult monkeys, but that longer term and/or more severe DR is required to determine if it is capable of influencing age-sensitive indices in long-lived primates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronj/48.1.b17

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 224

Metadata

Authors
Kemnitz, J. W., Weindruch, R., Roecker, E. B., Crawford, K., Kaufman, P. L., & Ershler, W. B.
Venue
Journal of Gerontology
Published
1993-01-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
B17-B26
ISSN
0022-1422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2331515993
Cited by
224
References
0
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dietary Restriction of Adult Male Rhesus Monkeys: Design, Methodology, and Preliminary Findings From the First Year of Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geronj/48.1.b17
The paper
Kemnitz, J. W., Weindruch, R., Roecker, E. B., Crawford, K., Kaufman, P. L., & Ershler, W. B. (1993). Dietary Restriction of Adult Male Rhesus Monkeys: Design, Methodology, and Preliminary Findings From the First Year of Study. Journal of Gerontology. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/48.1.b17

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.