Cited by 2,277Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsDietary Effects on HealthSirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine

Caloric Restriction Delays Disease Onset and Mortality in Rhesus Monkeys

Open access
Colman, Ricki J., Anderson, Rozalyn M., Johnson, Sterling C., Kastman, Erik K., Kosmatka, Kristopher J., Beasley, T. Mark, Allison, David B., Cruzen, Christina +3 more·2009·Science

Abstract

Starved to Life?: Caloric restriction—reducing the calories ingested by around 30% of that of a normal, fit individual—leads to substantial increases in life span in experimental animals. In an extensive study of caloric restriction in primates, Colman et al. (p. 201 ) report that rhesus monkeys, which were subjected to caloric restriction as adults and followed for the last 20 years, show decreased mortality and delayed onset of age-related diseases when compared to normally fed control animals. If compliance with such a diet were not so difficult, many humans would be strongly tempted to enjoy the decreased incidence of brain degeneration, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer apparent in this population of monkeys.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1173635

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dietary restriction has been the most effective strategy to demonstrate an increase in lifespan across a whole range of investigated species, including nonhuman primates.

    “dietary restriction has been the most effective strategy to demonstrate an increase in lifespan across a whole range of investigated species, including nonhuman primates”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Colman et al., 2009

    The paper’s Abstract says caloric restriction extends lifespan in diverse species, and its rhesus-monkey study found fewer age-related deaths under restriction. It does not establish that dietary restriction is the most effective strategy compared with others; it also reports that the effect on overall mortality in the monkeys was not statistically significant. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A calorie-restricted diet extends lifespan in a range of animal species including primates.

    “Such a diet is known to extend the lifespan in a range of animal species including primates 43”
  • Caloric restriction was found to prolong the healthy lifespan of rhesus monkeys in 2009.

    “Correspondingly, CR was found to prolong the healthy lifespan of rhesus monkeys in 2009.40”
  • A long-term experiment showed lifespan extension in calorie-restricted rhesus macaques.

    “Recently, this phenomenon has been extended to primates, in a long-term experiment showing lifespan extension in calorie-restricted rhesus macaques (75).”

    From Neural mechanisms of ageing and cognitive decline (2010) · cites this paper as [75]

  • Caloric restriction has beneficial effects on the function of the brain and its vulnerability to age-dependent pathology.

    “Caloric restriction has also been widely documented to have beneficial effects on the function of the brain and its vulnerability to age-dependent pathology.”

    From Neural mechanisms of ageing and cognitive decline (2010) · cites this paper as [75]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]McCay CM Crowell MF Maynard LA Nutrition 1935 5 155 2520283

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colman, R. J., Anderson, R. M., Johnson, S. C., Kastman, E. K., Kosmatka, K. J., Beasley, T. M., Allison, D. B., Cruzen, C., Simmons, H. A., Kemnitz, J. W., & Weindruch, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
  • Colman, Ricki J.
  • Weindruch, Richard
Venue
Science
Published
2009-07-10
Volume
325
Issue
5937
Pages
201-204
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1966132436
Cited by
2,277
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 127 · 2019: 111 · 2018: 133 · 2017: 145 · 2016: 133 · 2015: 161 · 2014: 159 · 2013: 210 · 2012: 181
FWCI
59.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P01-AG-11915, P01AG011915)
  • National Center for Research Resources (C06RR020141, RR 15459-01, C06RR015459, RR 020141-01, P51RR000167)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine
Keywords
caloric restriction, rhesus monkeys, aging, longevity, mortality, disease onset, diabetes mellitus, cancer, cardiovascular disease, brain atrophy
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Atrophy, Body Weight, Brain, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Glucose, Longevity, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neoplasms, Incidence, Caloric Restriction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review