Cited by 296Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionFrailty in Older AdultsPhysical Activity and Health

Older People's Views of Falls-Prevention Interventions in Six European Countries

Open access
Yardley, Lucy, Bishop, Felicity L., Beyer, Nina, Hauer, Klaus, Kempen, Gertrudis I. J. M., Piot-Ziegler, Chantal, Todd, Chris J., Cuttelod, Thérèse +3 more·2006·The Gerontologist

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our study identified factors common to a variety of populations and settings that may promote or inhibit uptake and adherence to falls-related interventions. DESIGN AND METHODS: Semistructured interviews to assess perceived advantages and barriers to taking part in falls-related interventions were carried out in six European countries with 69 people aged 68 to 97 years. The sample was selected to include people with very different experiences of participation or nonparticipation in falls-related interventions, but all individuals were asked about interventions that included strength and balance training. RESULTS: Attitudes were similar in all countries and contexts. People were motivated to participate in strength and balance training by a wide range of perceived benefits (interest and enjoyment, improved health, mood, and independence) and not just reduction of falling risk. Participation also was encouraged by a personal invitation from a health practitioner and social approval from family and friends. Barriers to participation included denial of falling risk, the belief that no additional falls-prevention measures were necessary, practical barriers to attendance at groups (e.g., transport, effort, and cost), and a dislike of group activities. IMPLICATIONS: Because many older people reject the idea that they are at risk of falling, the uptake of strength and balance training programs may be promoted more effectively by maximizing and emphasizing their multiple positive benefits for health and well-being. A personal invitation from a health professional to participate is important, and it also may be helpful to provide home-based programs for those who dislike or find it difficult to attend groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/46.5.650

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. McClure, R., Turner, C., Peel, N., Spinks, A., Eakin, E., & Hughes, K. (2005). Population-based interventions for the prevention of fall-related injuries in older people (Cochrane Review). London: Wiley. Retrieved March 1, 2006, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3.
  2. O'Brien Cousins, S., & Janzen, W. (1998). Older adult beliefs about exercise. In S. O'Brien Cousins (Ed.), Exercise, aging, and health: Overcoming barriers to an active old age (pp. 71-96). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yardley, L., Bishop, F. L., Beyer, N., Hauer, K., Kempen, G. I. J. M., Piot-Ziegler, C., Todd, C. J., Cuttelod, T., Horne, M., Lanta, K., & Holt, A. R.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Yardley, Lucy
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2006-10
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
650-660
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2143792318
Cited by
296
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
FWCI
28.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
fall prevention, older adults, strength and balance training, intervention uptake, adherence, barriers to participation, perceived benefits, fall risk perception, social approval, home-based programs, group activities
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Europe, Health Education, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Patient Compliance, Exercise, Treatment Refusal, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review