Cited by 332Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth, Education, and Aging

Older people's views of advice about falls prevention: a qualitative study

Open access
Yardley, L·2005·Health Education Research

Abstract

The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of older people's perceptions of falls prevention advice, and how best to design communications that will encourage older people to take action to prevent falls. Focus groups and interviews were carried out with 66 people aged 61-94 years recruited from a variety of settings, using falls prevention messages to stimulate discussion. Thematic analysis revealed that participants interpreted 'falls prevention' principally as meaning hazard reduction, use of aids and restriction of activity. Only one participant was aware that falls risk could be reduced by carrying out exercises to improve strength and balance. Falls prevention advice was typically regarded as useful in principle but not personally relevant or appropriate. Advice about falling was often depicted as common sense, only necessary for older or more disabled individuals, and potentially patronizing and distressing. Our findings suggest that older people do not reject falls prevention advice because of ignorance of their risk of falling, but because they see it as a potential threat to their identity and autonomy. Messages that focus on the positive benefits of improving balance may be more acceptable and effective than advice on falls prevention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/her/cyh077

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The focus groups in the falls prevention study most clearly revealed the crucial barrier that almost all older people saw falling as meaning that they were becoming frail and dependent, and therefore completely rejected the idea that they were at risk of falling or had any need of a falls prevention intervention.

    “It was this study that most clearly revealed the crucial barrier—that almost all older people saw falling as meaning that they were becoming frail and dependent, and therefore they completely rejected the idea that they were at risk of falling or had any need of a falls prevention intervention [49].”
  • People are often keen to distance themselves from negative stereotypes of ill health and ageing, and health-related interventions, including telehealth and telecare, can be perceived to undermine identity and autonomy, especially amongst older people.

    “Previous research demonstrates that people are often keen to distance themselves from negative stereotypes of ill health and ageing [34], and that health-related interventions, including telehealth and telecare, can be perceived to undermine identity and autonomy, especially amongst older people [19,20,35].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yardley, L.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Yardley, L
Venue
Health Education Research
Published
2005-11-22
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
508-517
ISSN
  • 0268-1153 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3648
OpenAlex
W2124850311
Cited by
332
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
FWCI
28.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Education Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health, Education, and Aging
Keywords
fall prevention, older adults, health advice, health communication, autonomy, identity, balance training, resistance training, hazard mitigation
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Communication, Female, Health Education, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review