Cited by 210Nursing care and researchGender Roles and Identity StudiesIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

Taking ‘Women's Work’ ‘Like a Man’: Husbands' Experiences of Care Work

Calasanti, Toni, King, Neal·2007·The Gerontologist

Abstract

Purpose We adopted a feminist, structural approach to husbands' experiences of caring for wives with Alzheimer's disease. This framework posited that men and women draw upon gender repertoires-situational ideals of behavior based upon their respective structural locations-that create gendered experiences of stress and coping strategies. Design and methods We used a qualitative, constructivist approach to analyze in-depth interviews with 22 spousal caregivers and observations within support groups. Our analysis focused on the nine husbands, the strategies these men reported using to deal with problems that arose in their care work, and the extent to which these are congruent with the masculinities of White men in the United States. Results We found that these husbands' approaches to caregiving and their strategies for dealing with the work and feelings involved were rooted in their sense of selves as men. We outline their overall approaches to caregiving, identify six strategies husbands used to deal with problems stemming from care work-exerting force, focusing on tasks, blocking emotions, minimizing disruption, distracting attention, and self-medicating-and tie these to their structural positions as working-, middle-, and professional-class men. Implications Theories of gender differences in the performance or quality of care work should tie these to structural arrangements. Unless the gendered bases upon which different styles or experiences are removed (i.e., structural in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/47.4.516

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Age relations' theoretical utility is evidenced by its application to critical examinations of various phenomena.

    “Age relations' theoretical utility is evidenced by its application to critical examinations of various phenomena.”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Calasanti & King 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calasanti, T., & King, N.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Calasanti, Toni
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2007-08-01
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
516-527
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2163688037
Cited by
210
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
15.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
spousal caregiving, Alzheimer's disease, masculinity, coping strategies, structural inequality, class position, emotional suppression, self-medication, women's employment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Gender Identity, Home Nursing, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Self Concept, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, United States, Caregivers, Spouses, Men's Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review