Cited by 140Nursing care and researchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Negative Impact and Positive Value in Caregiving: Validation of the COPE Index in a Six-Country Sample of Carers

Balducci, C., Mnich, E., McKee, K. J., Lamura, G., Beckmann, A., Krevers, B., Wojszel, Z. B., Nolan, M., Prouskas, C., Bien, B., Oberg, B.·2008·The Gerontologist

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present study attempts to further validate the COPE Index on a large sample of carers drawn from six European countries. DESIGN AND METHODS: We used a cross-sectional survey, with approximately 1,000 carers recruited in each of six countries by means of a common standard evaluation protocol. Our saturation recruitment of a designated quota of carers occurred by means of several channels, in identified geographical zones within countries. Interviews were carried out with primary informal carers by use of a common assessment tool. We subjected items of the COPE Index to principal component analysis and we assessed emergent components through the use of Cronbach's alpha reliability procedures. We examined factor components as summative scales for confirmatory correlations with caregiving and psychological variables. RESULTS: Three components emerged, which we identified as the negative impact of caregiving, the positive value of caregiving, and the quality of support for caregiving. Internal consistency was good for negative impact and satisfactory for positive value and quality of support. Negative value was most consistently and strongly correlated with caregiving and psychological variables, although we did find diverse associations between these variables and the COPE Index subscales. IMPLICATIONS: The COPE Index is a brief, first-stage assessment of some sophistication that can enable health and social care professionals to develop appropriately targeted interventions to enhance the positive aspects of the caregiving experience and quality of support, as well as reduce the negative impacts of caregiving.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/48.3.276

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 1986, The British journal of medical psychology, 56, 165
  2. Attar, 1965, Maryland state medical journal, 14, 61
  3. 2001, Gerontology, 47, 159
  4. 2006, The New Zealand medical journal, 119, 2053
  5. 2003, The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58B, S127

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Balducci, C., Mnich, E., McKee, K. J., Lamura, G., Beckmann, A., Krevers, B., Wojszel, Z. B., Nolan, M., Prouskas, C., Bien, B., & Oberg, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Istituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura per Anziani (IT)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Medical University of Białystok (PL)
  • National School of Public Health (GR)
Corresponding author
Balducci, C.
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2008-06-01
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
276-286
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2104136464
Cited by
140
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
16.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
informal caregivers, caregiver burden, psychometric validation, factor structure, cross-cultural validation, caregiver psychological well-being
MeSH terms
Affect, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Quality of Health Care, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Role, Severity of Illness Index, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review