Cited by 68Aging, Health, and DisabilityAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Relationship between perceived needs and assessed needs for Services in Community-Dwelling Older Persons

Cohen-Mansfield, Jiska, Frank, Julia·2008·The Gerontologist

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examine the relationship between the perceived needs and assessed needs of community-dwelling seniors. DESIGN AND METHODS: Trained research assistants administered the Naturally Occurring Retirement Community Baseline Survey to 268 community-dwelling older adults in suburban Maryland. Perceived and assessed needs were measured in the domains of health and function (memory, health, functional needs, mobility, and financial management), mental health (depression and loneliness), sensory functioning (vision), and health behaviors (nutrition and exercise). RESULTS: In the areas of functional needs, mobility, financial management, loneliness, and vision, persons who scored as more needy were already utilizing significantly more services. Of persons not receiving services, participants in need of memory, physical health, functional, loneliness, and nutrition services were more likely to indicate they would use those services. Although there were significant relationships between assessed needs and perceived needs, there was also a high level of discrepancy, such that a substantial proportion of those participants screened as not needing services requested those services, and a sizable proportion of those who screened as needing services did not request them. The results also show a high prevalence of needs among older adults and yet low service use by those with needs for these services. IMPLICATIONS: Both assessed and perceived needs should be examined in future need assessment surveys. Further investigations into the nature of discrepancies will likely result in improvement in the methodologies of screening assessed and perceived needs. Services targeted to older adults must be made more available to those dwelling in the community.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/48.4.505

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen-Mansfield, J., & Frank, J.
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2008-08
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
505-516
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2158911428
Cited by
68
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
perceived need, community-dwelling older adults, needs assessment, service utilization, naturally occurring retirement communities, functional needs, mobility (physical function), financial management, loneliness, depression, vision, nutrition, physical activity, memory, health behavior
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Health Resources, Health Services Needs and Demand, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Maryland, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Residence Characteristics, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review