Cited by 90Aging, Health, and DisabilityDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Measuring the Experience and Perception of Suffering

Open access
Schulz, R., Monin, J. K., Czaja, S. J., Lingler, J. H., Beach, S. R., Martire, L. M., Dodds, A., Hebert, R. S. +2 more·2010·The Gerontologist

Abstract

PURPOSE: assess psychometric properties of scales developed to assess experience and perception of physical, psychological, and existential suffering in older individuals. DESIGN AND METHODS: scales were administered to 3 populations of older persons and/or their family caregivers: individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their family caregivers (N = 105 dyads), married couples in whom 1 partner had osteoarthritis (N = 53 dyads), and African American and Hispanic caregivers of care recipients with AD (N = 121). Care recipients rated their own suffering, whereas caregivers provided ratings of perceived suffering of their respective care recipients. In addition, quality of life, health, and functional status data were collected from all respondents via structured in-person interviews. RESULTS: three scales showed high levels of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity. The scales were able to discriminate differences in suffering as a function of type of disease, demonstrated high intra-person correlations and moderately high inter-person correlations and exhibited predicted patterns of association between each type of suffering and indicators of quality of life, health status, and caregiver outcomes of depression and burden. IMPLICATIONS: suffering is an important but understudied domain. This article provides valuable tools for assessing the experience and perception of suffering in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/gnq033

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ADRD caregivers report higher distress, including symptoms of anxiety and depression, caregiving burden, and existential suffering, than caregivers of people with other chronic diseases such as heart failure or cancer.

    “ADRD caregivers report higher distress, including symptoms of anxiety and depression [5–9], caregiving burden [10], and existential suffering [11], than caregivers of people with other chronic diseases, such as heart failure or cancer.”

    From Feasibility and acceptability of an acceptance and commitment therapy intervention for caregivers of adults with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (2021) · cites this paper as [11]

    In Convergent and Discriminant Validity (page unavailable), caregivers in one Alzheimer’s disease sample rated their care recipients’ suffering higher on all three scales, including existential suffering, than caregivers in the other samples. This concerns caregivers’ ratings of care recipients’ suffering, not caregivers’ own existential distress; the comparison samples did not include heart failure or cancer caregivers. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schulz, R., Monin, J. K., Czaja, S. J., Lingler, J. H., Beach, S. R., Martire, L. M., Dodds, A., Hebert, R. S., Zdaniuk, B., & Cook, T. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Schulz, R.
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2010-05-17
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
774-784
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2124742743
Cited by
90
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0540865)
  • Alzheimer's Association
  • U.S. Public Health Service (09573)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG026010, AG015321, P50AG005133, AG026010, R01AG015321)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 076858, HL 076852, R24HL076852, R24HL076858)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-071944, P30MH071944)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR008272, NR 08272, R01NR009573)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
suffering, physical suffering, psychological suffering, existential suffering, scale development, psychometric properties, Alzheimer's disease, family caregivers, osteoarthritis, African American caregivers, Hispanic caregivers, quality of life, caregiver depression, caregiver burden, older adults
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Osteoarthritis, Perception, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review