Cited by 29Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityTechnology Use by Older AdultsPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

A Multi-faceted Approach to Promote Comprehension of Online Health Information Among Older Adults

Open access
Chin, Jessie, Moeller, Darcie D, Johnson, Jessica, Duwe, Elise A G, Graumlich, James F, Murray, Michael D, Morrow, Daniel G·2018·The Gerontologist

Abstract

Purpose of the Study: Older adults' self-care often depends on understanding and utilizing health information. Inadequate health literacy among older adults poses a barrier to self-care because it hampers comprehension of this information, particularly when the information is not well-designed. Our goal was to improve comprehension of online health information among older adults with hypertension who varied in health literacy abilities. Design and Methods: We identified passages about hypertension self-care from credible websites (typical passages). We used a multi-faceted approach to redesign these passages, revising their content, language, organization and format (revised passages). Older participants read both versions of the passages at their own pace. After each passage, they summarized the passage and then answered questions about the passage. Results: Participants better remembered the revised than the typical passages, summarizing the passages more accurately and uptaking information more efficiently (less reading time needed per unit of information remembered). The benefits for reading efficiency were greater for older adults with more health knowledge, suggesting knowledge facilitated comprehension of information in the revised passages. Implications: A systematic, multi-faceted approach to designing health documents can promote online learning among older adults with diverse health literacy abilities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/gnw254

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A cued recall protocol is common in studies involving text information learning with older adults in short learning sessions and is used as a proxy for learning.

    “Such a recall-based protocol is common in studies involving text information learning [19,40,91] with older adults in short learning sessions.”

    From OK Google, Let's Learn: Using Voice User Interfaces for Informal Self-Regulated Learning of Health Topics among Younger and Older Adults (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Methods (Procedure and Passage Memory Measures; page unavailable) describe older adults reading passages for no more than nine minutes each, then summarizing them and answering multiple-choice questions. This supports the use of recall-based measures in a short text-learning task, but the paper does not call its protocol cued recall or establish that such a protocol is common across studies. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cued recall was used as a short-term proxy for learning, as typical in reading comprehension studies.

    “In this study, we are using cued recall as a short-term proxy for learning, as typical in reading comprehension studies [5,19,40,91].”

    From OK Google, Let's Learn: Using Voice User Interfaces for Informal Self-Regulated Learning of Health Topics among Younger and Older Adults (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Methods (page unavailable) describe testing passage memory immediately after reading, using multiple-choice questions and passage summaries; the Results use these measures to assess comprehension. This supports the short-term assessment of learning, but the paper does not identify its measure as cued recall or state that cued recall is typical in reading-comprehension studies. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ekstrom R. B. French J. W. Harman H. H., & Dermen D (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gao X. Bertel S. Chin J. Madison A. Morrow D. G. Stine-Morrow E. A. L.,…Murray M (2011, October). The effects of domain knowledge and concept map on processing and memory for hypertension-related text. Poster presented at Health Literacy Annual Research Conference, Chicago. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zickuhr K., & Madden M (2012). Older adults and internet use. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/06/06/older-adults-and-internet-use/ [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chin, J., Moeller, D. D., Johnson, J., Duwe, E. A. G., Graumlich, J. F., Murray, M. D., & Morrow, D. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Peoria campus of the University of Illinois System (US)
  • Regenstrief Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Chin, Jessie
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2017-03-10
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
686-695
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2594550149
Cited by
28
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01 AG031718)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
health literacy, older adults, online health information, hypertension self-care, comprehension, health information design, readability, reading efficiency, information retention, self-care, online learning
MeSH terms
Aged, Documentation, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, United States, Education, Distance, Consumer Health Information, Health Literacy, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review